Cutaneous Lymphoma
Mycosis fungoides, Sezary syndrome, and primary cutaneous lymphomas
DefinitionClick to collapse
Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (PC-BCL) are a group of extranodal B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas that originate in and are usually confined to the skin at diagnosis [1,4]. They account for approximately 29% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas and comprise three main subtypes: primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL), primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL), and primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PC-DLBCL, leg type) [1,5]. PCFCL is the most common subtype (57% of PC-BCL), located primarily on the scalp, face, forehead, and trunk, typically presenting as solitary, firm, pink to violaceous papules, nodules, plaques, or tumors; ulceration is rare and multifocal lesions occur in about 15% of cases [1,2]. It follows an indolent course with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate exceeding 95% [1,2]. PCMZL (also termed primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoproliferative disorder in the International Consensus Classification) is the second most common subtype (24%–31% of PC-BCL), with distribution primarily on the trunk, upper extremities, and head; it presents as solitary or multiple erythematous to violaceous papules, small nodules, plaques, or tumors and has an excellent prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 99% [1]. The rarest subtype is PC-DLBCL, leg type (11%–19% of PC-BCL, 4% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas), which is distributed mostly to the leg but can occur at other sites in 10%–15% of cases; it typically appears as red to bluish plaques or tumors that can ulcerate and is aggressive with a poor prognosis (5-year OS rate of 50%) due to frequent extracutaneous relapses [1,2,3].
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and many clinicopathologic variants have been described [1,2]. MF is characterized by malignant transformation of skin-resident effector memory T cells and typically exhibits an indolent clinical course with intermittent, stable, or slow progression of skin lesions. Extracutaneous involvement may be seen in advanced stages, including lymph nodes (LNs), blood, or less commonly other organs [1,2]. Sézary syndrome (SS) is the leukemic variant of CTCL, closely related to MF but with unique characteristics. SS is rare, accounting for less than 5% of cutaneous lymphomas, and predominantly affects older individuals [1-3]. SS is characterized by the presence of atypical T cells (Sézary cells) in the skin causing diffuse erythema (erythroderma) and significant blood involvement with more than 1,000 abnormal cells/µL, defined as Sézary cells by cytopathologic assessment or flow cytometry (abnormal subsets including but not limited to CD4+CD7- or CD4+CD26- cells); TRBC1 may contribute in detecting clonality and can improve specificity when CD7 and CD26 are lost [3]. SS is thought to arise from thymic memory T cells, while MF arises from skin-resident effector memory T cells, supporting the contention that SS is a process distinct from MF [4]. Cases presenting as an overlap of these two conditions exist. The diagnostic workup includes biopsy of suspicious skin sites with immunohistochemistry (CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD20, CD30) and molecular analysis to detect clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements [5]. Large-cell transformation (LCT) of MF is defined histologically as more than 25% of tumor cells displaying large size; CD30 expression may be seen but is not part of the definition of LCT [6].
Primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (PCTLD) represent a spectrum that includes primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL), lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP), and 'borderline' cases with overlapping clinical and histopathologic features [1-3]. Clinical correlation with histopathologic features is essential for diagnosis; it cannot be made based on pathology alone. It is critical to distinguish these from other processes expressing CD30, including systemic T-cell lymphomas (e.g., systemic ALCL, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma [ATLL], PTCL), other CD30+ cutaneous lymphomas such as MF with large-cell transformation (MF-LCT), and benign disorders such as lymphomatoid drug reactions, arthropod bites, and viral infections [1,2]. Lymphomatoid drug reactions have been linked with certain drugs (e.g., amlodipine, carbamazepine, cefuroxime, valsartan) and may show CD30+ atypical large cells histologically. MF and primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell LPD can coexist in the same patient. PC-ALCL represents about 8% of cutaneous lymphoma cases [1]. Unlike systemic ALCL, PC-ALCL typically follows an indolent course; although cutaneous relapses are common, an excellent prognosis is usually maintained [4,5]. Histologically, PC-ALCL shows diffuse, cohesive sheets of large CD30+ (>75%) cells with anaplastic, pleomorphic, or immunoblastic appearance [1]. Clinical features typically include solitary or localized nodules or tumors (often ulcerated); multifocal lesions occur in about 20% of cases. Extracutaneous disease occurs in about 10% of cases, usually involving regional lymph nodes [1]. LyP is included under the WHO-EORTC classification but may be best classified as a lymphoproliferative disorder due to its frequently spontaneously regressing nature [1]. LyP is associated with other lymphomas such as MF, PC-ALCL, systemic ALCL, or Hodgkin lymphoma [6,7]. LyP is histologically heterogeneous with large atypical anaplastic, immunoblastic, or Hodgkin-like cells in a marked inflammatory background [1]. Clinical features are characterized by chronic, recurrent, spontaneously regressing papulonodular (grouped or generalized) skin lesions [1,6].
Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a very rare subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma characterized by mature, medium-sized, CD8+ activated T cells with tropism towards adipocytes in the subcutaneous tissue and, in extraordinary cases, involving adipocytes at other sites like the mesentery [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. It accounts for less than 1% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas, with a 5-year survival average of approximately 80% [4]. Patients with SPTCL tend to be young, often with a personal or family history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or other autoimmune disorders [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. The presentation includes non-ulcerated deep nodules typically involving the legs and other sites. The process may resolve with areas of lipodystrophy and hyperpigmentation. Fever and malaise are commonly observed at presentation. Signs and symptoms of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) may occasionally lead to severe morbidity or mortality; markers of HLH should be checked when SPTCL is suspected, with ferritin levels as a reliable marker to assess disease evolution [SPTCL/INTRO-1, TCLYM-F]. Rimming of bone marrow adipocytes by CD8+ T cells may be observed, but tumoral growth in nodal, bone marrow, or mesenchymal organs is not typically seen [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. This limited growth potential, along with the lack of common lymphoma driver mutations and the frequent detection of germline mutations in the HAVCR2 gene, suggests an immune dysregulation characterized by unchecked activated T cells driving the process [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. HAVCR2 encodes for T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain protein 3 (TIM-3), a membrane modulator of immune response resulting in hemophagocytosis and uncontrolled activation of the innate immune system. HAVCR2 mutations appear to be more prevalent in patients of Asian ancestry [SPTCL/INTRO-1, 24,31-33].
Primary cutaneous indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) were previously classified as primary cutaneous lymphomas but, due to their excellent prognosis and absence of extracutaneous progression, have been re-classified as LPD by both 2022 WHO classification and International Consensus Classification (ICC) [1-4]. They should be distinguished from malignant CTCL. The primary cutaneous indolent LPDs include primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell LPD (PCSM-TLPD) [5] and primary cutaneous CD8+ acral T-cell LPD (PCA-TLPD) [6]. PCSM-TLPD typically presents as solitary asymptomatic nodule or plaque on the head and neck, trunk, or upper extremities; spontaneous regression is common. Histology shows superficial band-like or nodular/diffuse infiltrate of predominantly small/medium-sized CD4+ T cells with a T-follicular helper (TFH) phenotype (CD3+, CD4+, CD8-, PD-1+, ICOS+, BCL6-/+, CXCL13-/+) and admixed reactive CD8+ T cells, B cells, plasma cells, and histiocytes [5]. PCA-TLPD presents as solitary asymptomatic papule, nodule, or plaque on ear, nose, or other acral sites; spontaneous regression is less common but can occur. Histology shows dermal, non-epidermotropic, diffuse or nodular infiltrate of atypical medium-sized CD8+ T cells with cytotoxic phenotype (CD3+, CD4-, CD8+, TIA+, granzyme B+/-, dot-like expression of CD68 in tumor cells, TCR alpha/beta) [6]. Both disorders have clonal TRB/TRG gene rearrangements in most cases. The 5-year overall survival rate is 100% for both PCSM-TLPD and PCA-TLPD; relapse is rare for PCSM-TLPD and uncommon for PCA-TLPD [5,6].
EpidemiologyClick to collapse
SubtypesClick to collapse
Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL)
Most common subtype (57% of PC-BCL). Located primarily on scalp, face, forehead, and trunk. Presents as solitary, firm, pink to violaceous papules, nodules, plaques, or tumors. Multifocal lesions in ~15% of cases. Ulceration rare. Indolent course with excellent prognosis (5-year OS >95%). Dissemination to extracutaneous sites extremely uncommon. Cutaneous recurrences occur near initial site in ~30% of cases. Immunophenotype: CD20+, CD79a+, BCL6+, surface Ig light chain positive, cytoplasmic Ig light chain negative; CD10 can be negative in diffuse growth pattern; BCL2 usually negative or minimally expressed. Most frequently germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype [4]. Can present with mixed nodular/diffuse or purely diffuse pattern mimicking DLBCL.
Primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL)
Second most common subtype (24%–31% of PC-BCL). Distribution primarily on trunk, upper extremities, and head. Presents as solitary or multiple erythematous to violaceous papules, small nodules, plaques, or tumors. Indolent course with excellent prognosis (5-year survival 99%). Relapses in skin occur in 50% of patients. Immunophenotype: CD10-, BCL6-, BCL2+, CD20+, CD79a+. IgG4 expressed in about one-third of cases. Divided into two groups based on IgH gene rearrangement: 1) CXCR3-negative, Ig class-switched subtype (IgG, IgA, IgE) with nodular plasma cell infiltrates; 2) less common CXCR3-positive, IgM-positive (non class-switched) subtype that may have extracutaneous extension [5-8]. IgG class-switched subtype is a clonal chronic lymphoproliferative disorder with indolent course.
Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PC-DLBCL, leg type)
Rarest subtype (11%–19% of PC-BCL; 4% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas). Distributed mostly to leg; 10%–15% occur at other sites. Presents as red to bluish plaques or tumors that can ulcerate. Aggressive course with poor prognosis (5-year OS rate 50%) due to high frequency of extracutaneous relapses [2,3]. Immunophenotype: CD20+, CD79a+, monotypic immunoglobulins, BCL2 (strong), IRF4/MUM1+, FOXP1+, IgM+, occasionally MYC+. CD10 usually negative. Most commonly activated B-cell (ABC) subtype by gene expression profiling. Gain-of-function mutations in MYD88 and CD79B co-occur in the 'MCD' subtype, specific to PC-DLBCL, leg type [4]. Inactivation of CDKN2A and MYD88 L265P associated with inferior prognosis.
Mycosis fungoides (MF)
Most common CTCL. Presents with patches, plaques, tumors, or erythroderma. Indolent course, slow progression. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD4+, CD8- (rarely CD8+), CD7-, CD30-/+, cytotoxic granule proteins negative. Typical T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements. Histologic variants include folliculotropic MF (FMF), pagetoid reticulosis, granulomatous slack skin, and hypopigmented MF.
Sézary syndrome (SS)
Leukemic variant. Characterized by erythroderma (confluence of erythema ≥80% BSA) and significant blood involvement (B2: ≥1,000 Sézary cells/µL). Arises from thymic memory T cells. Presents with diffuse erythema, lymphadenopathy, and pruritus. Flow cytometry shows expanded CD4+ cells with loss of CD7 and/or CD26. Clonal TRB/TRG rearrangement identical to skin clone. Rare (<5% of cutaneous lymphomas). Predominantly older individuals.
Folliculotropic MF (FMF)
Histologic variant of MF characterized by infiltration of hair follicles by atypical T lymphocytes. Presents as folliculocentric papules, nodules, or areas of alopecia on any hair-bearing area. Two distinct patterns: early-stage (indolent, favorable prognosis) and advanced-stage (worse prognosis). Skin biopsy reaching deep dermis needed.
Pagetoid reticulosis
Unilesional variant of MF with excellent prognosis. Presents as solitary, slowly enlarging patch or plaque, typically on extremities. Histology shows epidermotropic atypical T cells ('pagetoid' spread).
Granulomatous slack skin
Rare variant of MF presenting with redundant skin resembling cutis laxa on flexural areas. Characterized by granulomatous infiltrate.
Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL)
Represents about 8% of cutaneous lymphoma cases. Histologically characterized by diffuse, cohesive sheets of large CD30-positive (in >75%) cells with anaplastic, pleomorphic, or immunoblastic appearance. Clinical features typically include solitary or localized nodules or tumors (often ulcerated); multifocal lesions occur in about 20% of cases. Extracutaneous disease occurs in about 10% of cases, usually involving regional LNs. Patches and plaques may also be present; some degree of spontaneous remission may occur. Indolent course with excellent prognosis; cutaneous relapses common. Immunophenotype: CD30+ (>75% cells), CD4+, variable loss of CD2/CD5/CD3, CD8+ (<5%), cytotoxic granule proteins positive. ALK positivity and t(2;5) typically absent. DUSP22-IRF4 rearrangement described but not prognostic.
Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP)
Included under WHO-EORTC classification but best classified as a lymphoproliferative disorder due to frequent spontaneous regression. Histologically heterogeneous with large atypical anaplastic, immunoblastic, or Hodgkin-like cells in a marked inflammatory background; several histologic subtypes defined. Clinical features: chronic, recurrent, spontaneously regressing papulonodular (grouped or generalized) skin lesions. Not considered a malignant disorder. Excellent prognosis (OS rate 92% at 5 and 10 years). Associated with increased risk of secondary lymphomas (MF, PC-ALCL, systemic ALCL, Hodgkin lymphoma) [267-272]. Older age, positive TCR gene rearrangement, or mixed-type LyP may be prognostic for progression to lymphoma [268,270].
Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, alpha/beta type
The only subtype recognized as SPTCL in current classifications (WHO5 and ICC after 2008 reclassification). Characterized by mature, medium-sized, CD8+ activated T cells with tropism towards adipocytes. Presents as non-ulcerated deep nodules typically involving legs and other sites. Indolent course in most cases. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD8+, βF1+, CD2+, CD5+, CD7+, TIA1+, granzyme B+, perforin+. Typically EBER-ISH negative. Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements present. HAVCR2 germline mutations (Y82C, I97M, T101I) found in 25-85% of cases, more prevalent in Asian ancestry. Limited growth potential; no common lymphoma driver mutations. May be associated with HLH (~15-25% of cases), which confers worse prognosis (5-year survival ~46%).
Primary cutaneous gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma (PCGD-TCL) with panniculitis-like features
Previously considered part of SPTCL but now classified separately. More aggressive phenotype. Typically presents with panniculitis-like lesions but has gamma/delta TCR expression. Median age older, more likely male, significantly higher risk of death than SPTCL (HR 5.00, P = .005) [10]. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD4-, CD8-, TCR gamma/delta+, often CD56+. EBER-ISH often positive. Not associated with HAVCR2 mutations. Worse prognosis.
Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (PCSM-TLPD)
Solitary asymptomatic nodule or plaque; common locations: head and neck, trunk, upper extremities. No extracutaneous progression. Histology: superficial band-like or nodular/diffuse infiltrate of predominantly small/medium-sized CD4+ T cells with reactive infiltrate of admixed CD8+ T cells, B cells, plasma cells, and histiocytes including multinucleated giant cells. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD4+, CD8-, CD10-, PD-1+, ICOS+, BCL6-/+, CXCL13-/+, TCR alpha/beta. Clonal TRB/TRG gene rearrangements in most cases; sometimes concomitant clonal Ig gene rearrangements present. 5-year OS rate 100%; relapse is rare. Spontaneous remission common.
Primary cutaneous CD8+ acral T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (PCA-TLPD)
Solitary asymptomatic papule, nodule, or plaque; common locations: ear, nose, or other acral sites. No extracutaneous progression. Histology: dermal, non-epidermotropic, diffuse or nodular infiltrate of atypical medium-sized CD8+ T cells. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD4-, CD8+, TIA+, granzyme B+/-, dot-like expression of CD68 in tumor cells, TCR alpha/beta, EBV negative. Clonal TRB/TRG gene rearrangements in most cases. 5-year OS rate 100%; relapse is uncommon. Spontaneous remission less common but can occur.
Clinical FeaturesClick to collapse
Typical Presentation
Cutaneous lymphomas encompass a heterogeneous group of extranodal B-cell and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas originating in the skin. The most common subtypes include mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (PC-BCLs), primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (PCTLDs), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL), and primary cutaneous indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). MF typically presents with patches, plaques, or tumors that follow an indolent course, with involvement often limited to the skin for years [MFSS/INTRO-1]. SS is a rare leukemic variant characterized by diffuse erythema (erythroderma covering ≥80% BSA), significant blood involvement with >1000 Sézary cells/μL, and often lymphadenopathy [MFSS/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL) is the most common PC-BCL (57%), presenting as solitary, firm, pink to violaceous papules, nodules, or plaques on the scalp, face, forehead, or trunk, with an indolent course and 5-year overall survival (OS) >95% [CUTB/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL) accounts for 24%–31% of PC-BCLs, with solitary or multiple erythematous to violaceous papules, small nodules, or plaques on the trunk, upper extremities, or head, and a 5-year survival of 99% [CUTB/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PC-DLBCL, leg type) is the rarest PC-BCL (11%–19%), presenting as red to bluish plaques or tumors on one or both legs (or other sites in 10%–15%), often ulcerated, with aggressive behavior and a 5-year OS of 50% [CUTB/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL) typically presents as solitary or localized nodules or tumors (often ulcerated); multifocal lesions occur in about 20% of cases; it follows an indolent course with excellent prognosis [PCTLD/INTRO-1]. Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is characterized by chronic, recurrent, spontaneously regressing papulonodular (grouped or generalized) skin lesions [PCTLD/INTRO-1]. SPTCL presents with non-ulcerated deep nodules, typically involving the legs and other sites, often accompanied by fever and malaise; it may resolve with lipodystrophy and hyperpigmentation [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell LPD (PCSM-TLPD) presents as solitary asymptomatic nodule or plaque on head, neck, trunk, or upper extremities, with no extracutaneous progression and a 5-year OS of 100% [INCTLD-2]. Primary cutaneous CD8+ acral T-cell LPD (PCA-TLPD) presents as solitary asymptomatic papule, nodule, or plaque on ears, nose, or other acral sites, with no extracutaneous progression and a 5-year OS of 100% [INCTLD-2].
Symptoms
Pruritus
Nearly 90% of patients with CTCL experience pruritus, which can significantly impact quality of life [MFSS-B]. It may be localized or generalized and often correlates with disease sites.
Fever and malaise
Fever and malaise are commonly observed at presentation in SPTCL, especially when hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is present [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. Systemic B symptoms (fever, night sweats, weight loss) can occur in advanced MF/SS or PC-DLBCL.
Asymptomatic nodules/plaques
Many indolent cutaneous lymphomas (e.g., PCFCL, PCMZL, indolent T-cell LPD) present with asymptomatic skin lesions that may be discovered incidentally.
Signs
Erythroderma
Confluence of erythema covering ≥80% BSA, characteristic of SS and erythrodermic MF [MFSS-3A]. Associated with keratoderma, ectropion, and leg edema.
Tumors
Solid or nodular lesions ≥1 cm in diameter with depth/vertical growth. Common in tumor-stage MF (T3) and PC-ALCL.
Ulceration
Ulceration of tumors occurs in PC-ALCL and PC-DLBCL, leg type, and may indicate aggressive disease or necrotic tumors in SPTCL.
Folliculocentric papules/nodules
Seen in folliculotropic MF (FMF), often with alopecia in hair-bearing areas [MFSS/INTRO-1].
Hypopigmented or hyperpigmented patches
Lesions may be hypo- or hyperpigmented, particularly in MF variants. Hypopigmented MF is more common in younger patients and those with skin of color.
Red FlagsClick to collapse
Large cell transformation (LCT) defined as >25% large cells in skin biopsy – an independent poor prognostic factor [MFSS/INTRO-1, MS-17].
Erythroderma with high blood tumor burden (B2) indicative of Sézary syndrome.
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in SPTCL – associated with severe morbidity/mortality [SPTCL/INTRO-1].
Rapid progression or disease flare in patients receiving pembrolizumab, especially in erythrodermic MF/SS [MFSS-A (9 of 12)].
Development of multiple or rapidly growing tumors in PC-DLBCL, leg type, indicating aggressive course.
Ulcerated necrotic tumors with signs of systemic infection (Gram-negative rods) in advanced MF or SPTCL.
Folliculotropic MF with advanced stage (significant alopecia, plaques/tumors on head/neck) – associated with higher risk of progression.
Extracutaneous spread (nodal or visceral) in any cutaneous lymphoma – requires urgent staging and systemic therapy.
InvestigationsClick to collapse
Diagnostic
Skin biopsy (punch, incisional, or excisional)
Essential for histopathologic diagnosis; multiple biopsies may be needed to capture variability. Preferable to shave biopsy for deep dermal infiltrates.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel
To establish lineage and subtype. For MF/SS: includes CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD20, CD30 [MFSS-1]. For PC-BCL: includes CD20, CD3, CD10, BCL2, BCL6, IRF4/MUM1 [CUTB-1]. For PCTLD: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD30, CD56, ALK [PCTLD-1]. For SPTCL: TCR beta, TCR delta, CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD30, CD56 [SPTCL-1].
Molecular analysis for clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements
Supports T-cell clonality; high-throughput sequencing (HTS) offers higher sensitivity and allows clone tracking.
Flow cytometry of peripheral blood
For assessment of blood involvement in MF/SS; quantifies aberrant T cells (CD4+CD7- or CD4+CD26-). Also useful for detecting clonal TRBC1 expression.
Sézary cell preparation
May be useful if flow cytometry is non-diagnostic, though subjective.
Staging
Integrated whole body FDG-PET/CT (preferred) or C/A/P CT with contrast
For MF/SS: recommended for ≥T2b, LCT, FMF, palpable adenopathy, or abnormal labs; consider for T2a [MFSS-2]. For PC-BCL: CT and/or PET/CT to rule out systemic disease; may be omitted if clinically indicated for indolent subtypes [CUTB-1]. For PC-ALCL: C/A/P CT or FDG-PET/CT [PCTLD-2]. For SPTCL: whole body FDG-PET/CT to assess extracutaneous involvement [SPTCL-1].
Chest/abdomen/pelvis CT with contrast
Alternative to PET/CT; may be sufficient for some subtypes. Neck CT with contrast useful if whole body PET not done [MFSS-2].
Bone marrow biopsy
Not routinely required for MF/SS; consider for unexplained cytopenias. For PC-DLBCL, leg type, it is essential due to aggressive nature. For SPTCL, consider if unexplained cytopenias or HLH [CUTB-1, MFSS-2, SPTCL-1].
Lymph node biopsy
For clinically abnormal nodes (>1.5 cm longest diameter). Excisional or core needle biopsy preferred; FNA alone insufficient [MFSS-2, PCTLD-2].
Pregnancy testing
Many treatments are contraindicated in pregnancy.
Biomarkers
TRB and TRG gene rearrangement testing (by PCR or HTS)
Essential for confirming T-cell clonality; HTS allows precise identification and monitoring.
MYD88 L265P and CD79B mutation testing (MGPT or FISH)
Distinguishes PC-DLBCL, leg type (MYD88 L265P positive) from PCFCL; associated with inferior prognosis [CUTB/INTRO-2, Discussion MS-4].
DUSP22-IRF4 gene rearrangement (FISH)
Detected in PC-ALCL and LyP; high specificity for PC-ALCL [PCLYM-B 1 of 2].
JAK2 gene rearrangements (MGPT or FISH)
Disease-defining genetic abnormality in CTCL; can inform therapeutic decisions [PCLYM-B 2 of 2].
HTLV-1/2 serology
To exclude adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), which can present with skin lesions.
HAVCR2 germline mutation testing
Detects mutations associated with SPTCL and HLH; more prevalent in Asian ancestry.
StagingClick to collapse
For MF and SS: TNMB classification and clinical staging as per ISCL/EORTC 2022 update (Olsen et al. Blood 2022) [MFSS-3, MFSS-4]. For PC-BCL and other cutaneous lymphomas (excluding MF/SS): TNM classification [CUTB-A]. For PCTLD, the same TNM classification applies. For SPTCL, no formal staging system is used; staging is based on presence of HLH and tumor burden (localized vs. widespread). For primary cutaneous indolent LPD, staging involves physical exam and palpation of LNs; no other staging required if typical presentation [INCTLD-2].
T Categories
| Stage | Description |
|---|---|
| T0 | Absence of clinically suspicious lesions (used for clinical trials to track clearance). |
| T1 | Patches, papules, and/or plaques covering <10% BSA. Subclassified: T1a (patch only), T1b (plaque/papule ± patch) [MFSS-3]. |
| T2 | Patches, papules, and/or plaques covering ≥10% BSA. Subclassified: T2a (patch only), T2b (plaque ± patch) [MFSS-3]. |
| T3 | One or more tumors ≥1 cm in diameter (solid/nodular lesion with depth) [MFSS-3]. |
| T4 | Confluence of erythema covering ≥80% BSA (erythroderma) [MFSS-3]. |
N Categories
| Stage | Description |
|---|---|
| N0 | No clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes; no biopsy necessary. |
| N1 | Clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes; Dutch grade 1 or NCI LN0-2. Subclassified: N1a (clone negative or equivocal), N1b (clone positive and identical to skin) [MFSS-3]. |
| N2 | Clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes; Dutch grade 2 or NCI LN3. Subclassified: N2a (clone negative/equivocal), N2b (clone positive and identical to skin) [MFSS-3]. |
| N3 | Clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes; Dutch grade 3-4 or NCI LN4. Subclassified: N3a (clone negative/equivocal), N3b (clone positive and identical to skin) [MFSS-3]. |
| NX | Clinically abnormal peripheral or central LN but no pathologic determination; surrogate means may be used per Tri-Society consensus [MFSS-3]. |
M Categories
| Stage | Description |
|---|---|
| M0 | No visceral involvement. |
| M1a | Bone marrow involvement only: clone positive and identical to skin (or negative/indeterminate) [MFSS-3]. |
| M1b | Non-bone marrow visceral involvement: clone positive and identical to skin (or negative/indeterminate) [MFSS-3]. |
| MX | Visceral involvement neither confirmed nor refuted by available pathologic or imaging assessment [MFSS-3]. |
Stage Groupings
| Group | Criteria | Clinical Meaning | Five Yr Survival | Treatment Intent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | T1, N0, M0, B0 or B1 | Limited skin involvement alone (<10% BSA). Excellent prognosis; most patients treated with skin-directed therapies alone. | >95% (from literature, not explicitly stated in guideline but implied by excellent prognosis and indolent course) | Curative/palliative with skin-directed therapy; systemic therapy reserved for selected cases. |
| IB | T2, N0, M0, B0 or B1 | Skin-only disease with ≥10% BSA. May be patch or plaque disease. Good prognosis, but higher burden may require systemic therapy. | Approximately 85-90% (estimated from CLIC data) | Curative/palliative; skin-directed therapy first; consider systemic therapy for higher burden. |
| IIA | T1-2, N1-2, M0, B0 or B1 | Skin disease (any T1-2) with lymph node involvement (non-bulky). Prognosis intermediate. | Approximately 70-80% (estimated) | Palliative; skin-directed plus systemic therapy as needed; often combined approach. |
| IIB | T3, N0-2, M0, B0 or B1 | Tumor stage disease (one or more tumors). Higher risk of progression and LCT. Prognosis worse than plaque-stage. | Approximately 50-60% (from CLIC data for advanced MF) | Palliative; systemic therapy ± RT; consider allogeneic HCT in eligible patients with refractory disease. |
| IIIA | T4, N0-2, M0, B0 | Erythrodermic disease without significant blood involvement. Risk of secondary infections and progression. | Approximately 40-50% (from CLIC data) | Palliative; systemic therapy with or without ECP; supportive care critical. |
| IIIB | T4, N0-2, M0, B1 | Erythrodermic disease with low blood tumor burden (B1). | Similar to IIIA | Palliative; systemic therapy including agents targeting blood involvement (e.g., mogamulizumab). |
| IVA1 | T1-4, N0-2, M0, B2 | Sézary syndrome (B2 blood involvement) without nodal involvement. Aggressive variant; requires systemic therapy. | Approximately 30-40% (from CLIC data for SS) | Palliative; systemic therapy as primary; consider allogeneic HCT in responding patients. |
| IVA2 | T1-4, N3, M0, B0-2 | Any skin involvement with bulky nodal disease (N3). High risk of progression. | Approximately 25-35% | Palliative; systemic therapy with multiagent chemotherapy may be considered; allogeneic HCT if eligible. |
| IVB | T1-4, N0-3, M1a or M1b, B0-2 | Visceral disease (solid organ involvement). Poor prognosis; limited treatment options. | Approximately 15-20% (from CLIC data) | Palliative; systemic therapy; consider clinical trials and allogeneic HCT if disease controlled. |
Staging Pearls
- For MF/SS, blood involvement (B stage) is critical: B0 = <250/μL aberrant cells; B1 = does not meet B0 or B2; B2 = ≥1000/μL [MFSS-3A].
- Lymph node assessment uses both Dutch grading and NCI-VA classification; clonal correlation with skin is essential for precise N staging [MFSS-5].
- In PC-BCL, the TNM classification (CUTB-A) uses T staging based on number of lesions and body region involvement, not BSA. T1 = solitary lesion (<5 cm or ≥5 cm); T2 = multiple lesions limited to 1 or 2 contiguous body regions; T3 = generalized skin involvement (2 noncontiguous or ≥3 regions). N and M same as Ann Arbor [CUTB-A].
- For SPTCL, formal staging is not used; HLH status and tumor burden (localized vs. widespread) guide treatment [SPTCL-2, SPTCL-3].
- Large cell transformation (LCT) is a histologic feature that can occur at any stage and is independently associated with poorer prognosis; rebiopsy if suspected [MFSS-4 footnote].
- Folliculotropic MF (FMF) is associated with higher risk of progression; histologic evidence may alter treatment approach even in early stage [MFSS-4 footnote].
- Clinical staging integrates T, N, M, B categories as per MFSS-4 table. All recommendations are category 2A unless otherwise indicated.
Management PrinciplesClick to collapse
Cutaneous lymphomas are a heterogenous group of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas originating in the skin. The management philosophy emphasizes individualized, multimodal care coordinated by a multidisciplinary team (hematology/oncology, dermatology, pathology, radiation oncology) with expertise in cutaneous lymphomas, particularly at specialized centers [MFSS/INTRO-2]. Treatment goals are tailored to control symptoms, minimize risk of progression, and maintain quality of life. Durable remissions off therapy are uncommon; most patients experience relapse after discontinuation, so therapies with lower side-effect profiles and absence of cumulative toxicity are often used in an ongoing or maintenance fashion. Other than allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), therapies are not given with curative intent. Skin-directed therapies and systemic regimens that can be tolerated for longer durations are prioritized in earlier lines, moving to more toxic options only when necessary. Responses often differ across compartments (skin, blood, lymph nodes, viscera) due to variable drug penetration, so treatment decisions are guided by clinical assessment of the dominant disease compartment and symptom burden rather than uniform criteria [MFSS/INTRO-2]. In patients requiring chemotherapy, single agents are preferred over combination chemotherapy due to higher toxicity of multiagent regimens and short-lived responses [MFSS/INTRO-2].
Curative (selected cases)
Patients with localized disease suitable for definitive RT or surgical excision (e.g., unilesional MF, solitary PC-ALCL, limited PC-BCL)
Definitive involved-site radiation therapy (ISRT) or complete surgical excision, often with curative intent. For PC-DLBCL leg type, chemoimmunotherapy plus RT is used with curative intent. Allogeneic HCT may be considered for selected patients with advanced MF/SS or SPTCL who achieve response prior to transplant.
Disease control and symptom palliation
Most patients with MF/SS (early- and advanced-stage), indolent PC-BCL, PC-ALCL with multifocal lesions, LyP, SPTCL without HLH, and relapsed/refractory disease
Sequential use of skin-directed therapies (topical corticosteroids, mechlorethamine, phototherapy, RT) and systemic agents (retinoids, interferons, HDAC inhibitors, mogamulizumab, brentuximab vedotin, ECP) aimed at reducing disease burden and symptom relief. Systemic therapy is often combined with skin-directed therapy to maximize responses. Maintenance or tapering is considered for those with clinical benefit.
Control of life-threatening complications
Patients with SPTCL and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), or aggressive LCT with extracutaneous disease
Etoposide-based combination chemotherapy is recommended to control HLH first, then move to disease-specific therapies. For generalized LCT, multiagent chemotherapy or single-agent systemic therapy with RT for local control is used. Allogeneic HCT may be considered as consolidation.
A multidisciplinary team approach is essential for optimal diagnosis and comprehensive care. Required specialties include: hematology/oncology, dermatology (with expertise in cutaneous lymphoma), pathology (with expertise in cutaneous lymphoma diagnosis), and radiation oncology. For patients with advanced disease, consultation at centers with expertise in CTCL is preferred [MFSS/INTRO-2]. Dermatopathology/hematopathology review is recommended for confirmation of diagnosis, especially for rare variants [MFSS/INTRO-2].
Performance status (PS) is considered in treatment selection, though specific PS cutoffs are not mandated. Clinical trials for MF/SS often require ECOG PS 0-2 (ALCANZA) or 0-1 (MAVORIC). For PC-ALCL, ECOG PS 0-2 was used in the ALCANZA trial. In SPTCL, PS is not explicitly defined but influences ability to tolerate chemotherapy. Treatment decisions are individualized based on age, comorbidities, and organ function as per standard oncology practice.
Management PathwaysClick to collapse
Branching: TNM classification for cutaneous lymphoma other than MF/SS (CUTB-A), Extent of disease: solitary/regional (T1-2) vs generalized skin only (T3) vs extracutaneous disease, Presence of symptoms and feasibility of RT or surgery
Branching: Presence of aggressive histology and high risk of extracutaneous relapse, Staging with PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy required
Branching: Skin involvement <10% BSA, no extracutaneous disease, Response to initial skin-directed therapy
Branching: Skin disease burden (lower: predominantly patch vs higher: predominantly plaque), Response to initial therapy, Presence of folliculotropic MF or LCT
Branching: Limited tumor lesions (single/few T3) vs generalized tumor lesions, Response to initial therapy, Presence of LCT
Branching: Erythroderma covering ≥80% BSA, Blood involvement (B0 vs B1), Response to initial therapy
Branching: Presence of Sézary syndrome (B2 blood involvement) vs non-Sézary stage IVA2 or IVB (visceral disease), Disease burden (low-intermediate vs high Sézary cell count)
Branching: Extent of LCT: limited cutaneous lesions vs generalized cutaneous or extracutaneous lesions, CD30 expression status
Branching: Extent of disease: solitary/grouped vs multifocal lesions vs regional node involvement, CD30 positivity (>75% cells required for diagnosis)
Branching: Extent of lesions: limited vs extensive, Presence of symptoms, Association with other lymphomas
Branching: Presence of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), High tumor burden (widespread subcutaneous disease), Response to first-line therapy
Branching: Absence of HLH, Low tumor burden (localized or limited subcutaneous disease), Response to first-line therapy
Pretreatment EvaluationClick to collapse
Clinical Assessment
Imaging Studies
Laboratory Studies
Pathologic Evaluation
Bone Marrow and Lymph Node Evaluation
SurgeryClick to collapse
Surgery has a limited but defined role in the management of cutaneous lymphomas, primarily for diagnostic biopsy and for curative intent in selected solitary lesions. Surgical excision is not a primary modality for most cutaneous lymphomas due to their multifocal nature and radiosensitivity. However, for solitary/regional indolent B-cell lymphomas (PCFCL, PCMZL) and solitary PC-ALCL, excision may be considered as an alternative to RT, especially for small lesions where minimal non-disfiguring surgery is feasible. For LyP, surgery is not indicated due to spontaneous regression. For MF/SS, surgery is not a standard treatment except for biopsy or excision of solitary nodes for staging. For SPTCL, surgery is limited to diagnostic biopsy. For primary cutaneous indolent T-cell LPD, excision can be considered for symptomatic solitary lesions.
Surgical excision should be minimal and non-disfiguring, particularly for cosmetically sensitive areas [CUTB-2, PCTLD-4].
Excision is typically reserved for small solitary lesions where complete removal is achievable with acceptable cosmetic outcome.
Post-excision, close observation for recurrence is warranted; many lesions may recur locally, and RT can be used as salvage.
For PC-ALCL, surgical excision alone or combined with ISRT is an option for solitary/grouped lesions [PCTLD-4].
For PC-BCL, excision is an option for solitary/regional disease, but local ISRT is the preferred initial treatment due to higher response rates and lower recurrence at the initial site [CUTB-2].
In SPTCL, surgery is not therapeutic except for diagnostic biopsy due to the deep subcutaneous nature of the disease.
For MF/SS, surgery is not used as primary therapy; skin biopsies are essential for diagnosis and monitoring.
Procedures
Diagnostic skin biopsy
Essential for diagnosis of all cutaneous lymphomas.
Surgical excision of solitary lesions
Selected solitary/regional indolent B-cell lymphomas (PCFCL, PCMZL) and solitary PC-ALCL where RT is not desired or feasible.
Excisional lymph node biopsy
Essential for staging in MF/SS and PC-ALCL with regional node involvement; to confirm or rule out lymphoma involvement.
Radiation TherapyClick to collapse
Radiation therapy (RT) is a cornerstone of treatment for cutaneous lymphomas, used with curative intent for localized disease (e.g., unilesional MF, solitary PC-ALCL, indolent PC-BCL) and with palliative intent for symptom relief, disease control, and as part of combined modality therapy. RT is highly effective due to the radiosensitivity of lymphoid cells. The general intent is to treat evident skin disease with adequate margin both circumferentially and in depth. Techniques include external beam RT (EBRT) with photons, electrons, or low-energy x-rays. Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is a specialized technique for widespread skin involvement in MF [PCLYM-A].
Principles
- ISRT is recommended as the appropriate field for treating primary cutaneous lymphomas. Planning may require careful physical exam, ultrasound, or CT-based simulation [PCLYM-A 1 of 3].
- The visible or palpable disease defines the gross tumor volume (GTV); CTV expands 1-2 cm circumferentially and in depth, not into intact bone. PTV accounts for setup variations [PCLYM-A 1 of 3].
- For cutaneous lesions, surface margins of 1.0-1.5 cm are generally adequate. Depth margins should include all involved tissue. Treatment with 6-9 MeV electrons (with surface bolus) or low-energy x-rays (~100 Kv) provides adequate depth [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
- For nodal disease, ISRT principles follow NCCN T-Cell or B-Cell Lymphoma guidelines [PCLYM-A 1 of 3].
- TSEBT techniques cover the entire cutaneous surface; patients are treated standing on a rotating platform or with multiple body positions. Shadowed areas may need supplemental electron fields. 'Shadowed' areas are supplemented individually [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
- TSEBT is common practice to follow with systemic therapies to maintain response. Limited safety data exist for combining TSEBT with systemic retinoids, HDAC inhibitors, or mogamulizumab [MFSS-A 2 of 12].
Dose Frameworks
| Name | Total Dose | Dose Per Fraction | Fractions | Schedule | Indication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCFCL/PCMZL curative dose | 24 Gy | 2 Gy (conventional fractionation) | 12 fractions | Once daily, 5 days/week | Optimal initial management for solitary/regional disease. Lower doses (4 Gy) may be used initially with supplemental RT (4-20 Gy) for inadequate response, though data limited [PCLYM-A 2 of 3]. |
| PCFCL/PCMZL palliative/relapsed dose | 4 Gy | 2 Gy | 2 fractions | Typically 2 fractions | For relapsed disease; may be adequate for palliation [PCLYM-A 2 of 3]. |
| MF/SS individual plaque/tumor - low dose palliative | 8-12 Gy | 3-5 Gy (preferred depending on skin condition and volume; up to 8 Gy in single fraction may be used) | Variable; e.g., 2-4 fractions | Low-dose RT with palliative intent, usually as combined modality therapy. Some institutions explore 4 Gy [PCLYM-A 2 of 3]. | |
| MF/SS unilesional presentation - definitive dose | 24-30 Gy | 2-3 Gy | 12-15 fractions | Conventional fractionation | For rare initial unilesional lesions, given as monotherapy with curative intent [PCLYM-A 2 of 3]. |
| TSEBT for MF/SS | 12-36 Gy | 4-6 Gy per week | Variable (e.g., 12 Gy in 2-3 weeks, 30-36 Gy over 6-9 weeks) | Variety of techniques; common dose ~12 Gy. Higher doses (24-36 Gy) for more extensive or refractory disease. Lower dose has fewer short-term complications and better ability to retreat [PCLYM-A 2 of 3]. | |
| PC-ALCL curative dose | 24 Gy | 2 Gy | 12 fractions | Conventional fractionation | RT for curative treatment. Doses as low as 6 Gy used at some institutions, but data limited [PCLYM-A 3 of 3]. |
| PC-ALCL palliative dose | 4-8 Gy | 2 Gy x 2 or 4 Gy x 1 | 2 or 1 fractions | Palliative RT [PCLYM-A 3 of 3]. | |
| SPTCL curative dose | Up to 40 Gy | 2 Gy | 20 fractions | Adequate dose is uncertain; consensus organizations recommend up to 40 Gy [PCLYM-A 3 of 3]. |
Approaches
| Name | Dose Fractionation | Concurrent Chemotherapy | Indication | Key Trial | Toxicities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local ISRT for cutaneous lesions | Varies by histology: PC-BCL 24 Gy (4-20 Gy supplement for lower initial doses); MF plaque/tumor 8-12 Gy (24-30 Gy for unilesional); PC-ALCL 24 Gy; SPTCL up to 40 Gy | Not typically concurrent; sequential or combined modality in some settings (e.g., PC-DLBCL leg type, generalized MF/SS with LCT). Limited safety data for combination with systemic retinoids, HDAC inhibitors, or mogamulizumab. | Solitary or localized skin lesions across all subtypes. | For MF: Thomas TO et al. (2013) reported 94% CR with single-fraction 8 Gy. For PC-ALCL: Million L et al. (2016) reported 95% cCR with RT alone. For PC-BCL: Senff NJ et al. (2007) reported 99% CR with RT. | Skin erythema, desquamation, alopecia (reversible), fibrosis (with higher doses), hypopigmentation, telangiectasias. Risk of secondary skin cancers with long-term use, especially with higher doses and in combination with phototherapy. |
| TSEBT for MF/SS | 12-36 Gy over 2-9 weeks. Boosts of 4-12 Gy to individual tumors. Additional local treatment for recalcitrant sites after generalized treatment. | Not standard due to limited safety data. Can be sequenced with systemic therapies. | Widespread skin involvement in MF/SS (stage IB-IVA), especially for generalized plaque/tumor disease. Also used as cytoreductive therapy before allogeneic HCT in selected patients. | Hoppe RT et al. (2015) pooled analysis: ORR 88% with 12 Gy. Morris S et al. (2017): ORR 87% with 12 Gy, median PFS 13 months. Higher doses (30-36 Gy) associated with better outcomes in T2 disease but more toxicity. | Acute: erythema, desquamation, edema, temporary alopecia, nail loss, fatigue. Late: skin atrophy, telangiectasias, chronic xerosis, increased risk of secondary skin cancers. Lower doses minimize acute toxicity. Antibiotic therapy recommended in erythrodermic patients due to infection risk. |
Systemic TherapyClick to collapse
Systemic therapy is indicated for advanced-stage MF/SS (≥ stage IIB), patients with inadequate response to skin-directed therapy, multifocal PC-ALCL, PC-ALCL with regional node involvement, extensive LyP, SPTCL with HLH or high tumor burden, and PC-DLBCL leg type. For MF/SS, the treatment philosophy emphasizes sequential use of single agents with favorable toxicity profiles before moving to more immunosuppressive or multiagent regimens. FDA-approved agents for MF/SS include bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, denileukin diftitox-cxdl, mogamulizumab, romidepsin, and vorinostat. Systemic therapy is often combined with skin-directed therapy to maximize responses in the skin compartment. Therapeutic responses vary across compartments; agents like mogamulizumab show greater efficacy in blood and skin than in lymph nodes, while HDAC inhibitors have variable responses. Therefore, treatment decisions are guided by dominant disease compartment and symptom burden [MFSS/INTRO-2]. For PC-ALCL, brentuximab vedotin is the preferred agent. For SPTCL, immunomodulatory agents (cyclosporine, methotrexate) are first-line for low burden, while etoposide-based chemotherapy is used for HLH. Multiagent chemotherapy is generally reserved for refractory disease or as a bridge to allogeneic HCT.
Key Regimens
Treatment Response AssessmentClick to collapse
Title
Treatment Response Assessment in Cutaneous Lymphomas
Timing
Response assessment should occur at regular intervals, tailored to the specific disease type, stage, and treatment modality. For MF/SS, assessment typically occurs every 1-3 months during active therapy and every 3-6 months during observation or maintenance. For PC-BCL, additional imaging is not routinely needed during treatment; end-of-treatment PET/CT or CT may be performed to assess response or if clinical suspicion of progression arises [CUTB-2]. For PC-ALCL, follow-up includes monitoring size and number of lesions; imaging repeated as clinically indicated. For LyP, lifelong follow-up is warranted due to high risk for second lymphoid malignancies [PCTLD-5]. For SPTCL, response assessment is guided by clinical exam, imaging (PET/CT), and laboratory markers (ferritin, LDH) especially if HLH was present.
Response Logic
-
Patients with disease achieving a clinical benefit (CR or PR) and/or those responding to primary treatment should be considered for maintenance or tapering of regimens to optimize response duration [MFSS-6, MFSS-7, MFSS-8, MFSS-10, MFSS-11].
-
For MF/SS, responses can vary across compartments (skin, blood, lymph nodes, viscera). Treatment decisions to continue, switch, or combine therapies are frequently guided by clinical assessment of the dominant disease compartment and symptom burden rather than uniform response criteria [MFSS/INTRO-2].
-
Patients with PR and suboptimal quality of life should be treated with other or additional primary treatment options to improve response before moving to refractory disease treatment [MFSS/INTRO-2].
-
Disease relapse after discontinuation of therapy may respond to re-treatment with previous therapy [MFSS/INTRO-2].
-
For PC-BCL, additional imaging during treatment is not needed. PET/CT or C/A/P CT at end of treatment may be needed to assess response or if clinical suspicion of progressive disease [CUTB-2].
-
For PC-ALCL, patients with clinical benefit should be considered for maintenance or tapering. Relapsed disease often responds well to the same treatment. PR should be treated with other primary treatment options not received before [PCTLD-4].
-
For LyP, patients with clinical benefit should continue current management. If no response/refractory, alternative regimens or clinical trial are considered [PCTLD-5].
-
For SPTCL, patients with CR/PR after first-line therapy should be considered for maintenance or tapering. Relapse can be retreated with same regimen or alternate. Inadequate response after multiple therapies may require allogeneic HCT or clinical trial [SPTCL-2, SPTCL-3].
Imaging Recommendations
-
MF/SS: Imaging (with modalities used in workup) indicated when suspicious of clinical extracutaneous disease (e.g., new significant adenopathy, abnormal labs, accelerated skin disease) [MFSS-7, MFSS-8, MFSS-10]. For stage IV disease, repeat imaging as clinically indicated based on distribution of disease [MFSS-11].
-
PC-BCL: Additional imaging during the course of treatment is not needed after negative initial staging. FDG-PET/CT or C/A/P CT with contrast at the end of treatment may be needed to assess response or if clinical suspicion of progressive disease [CUTB-2].
-
PC-ALCL: Imaging with CT or PET/CT is indicated when there is suspicion of extracutaneous disease (e.g., palpable nodes, systemic symptoms). For LyP, imaging is not done for typical cases; only if suspicion of associated lymphoma [PCTLD-2, PCTLD-3].
-
SPTCL: Whole body FDG-PET/CT is essential for initial staging and should be repeated as clinically indicated to assess response and detect extracutaneous involvement [SPTCL-1].
-
Indolent LPD: Surveillance imaging is not needed for confirmed cases. Imaging can be considered as part of diagnostic workup to exclude systemic lymphoma when clinically indicated [INCTLD-1].
Biopsy Or Salvage Logic
-
MF/SS: Rebiopsy skin if suspicious of LCT or FMF (not previously confirmed pathologically) or aggressive clinical behavior [MFSS-2]. If drug-induced skin eruption (e.g., mogamulizumab-associated rash) mimics disease progression, skin biopsy with adequate immunohistochemical stains and clonality assessment is recommended to distinguish from lymphoma progression [MFSS-A, PCLYM-C discussion].
-
PC-BCL: Rebiopsy if pathologic findings are non-diagnostic or discordant with clinical presentation. For relapsed disease, rebiopsy may confirm persistent disease.
-
PC-ALCL: Biopsy of enlarged LN or suspected extracutaneous sites is essential. Excisional or core needle biopsy preferred; FNA insufficient for initial diagnosis. Rebiopsy if consult material is non-diagnostic [PCTLD-2].
-
SPTCL: Rebiopsy if pathologic findings are non-diagnostic or discordant. Consider rebiopsy if clinical suspicion of progression or transformation.
-
Salvage therapy logic: For MF/SS, patients with refractory disease to multiple prior therapies should be considered for clinical trial, Table 7 regimens (relapsed/refractory disease), or allogeneic HCT. For PC-ALCL, refractory disease to multiple prior therapies should be managed with systemic therapies recommended for MF with LCT (Table 6). For LyP, refractory disease can be treated with brentuximab vedotin if not previously used. For SPTCL, progressive disease to multiple lines may require allogeneic HCT or clinical trial.
Molecular Pathogenesis Primary Cutaneous B Cell LymphomasClick to collapse
Gene expression profiling (GEP) studies have demonstrated that PCFCL is characterized by a germinal center B-cell (GCB) phenotype, whereas PC-DLBCL, leg type is most commonly characterized by an activated B-cell (ABC) phenotype [4,12,19]. In nodal DLBCL, GCB phenotype is associated with better prognosis than ABC phenotype. Immunohistochemical (IHC) and GEP-based algorithms used to classify nodal DLBCL into GCB or non-GCB subtypes have also shown utility in distinguishing PCFCL from PC-DLBCL, leg type [20-22]. However, these algorithms may be limited in differentiating PC-DLBCL, leg type from PCFCL with large cells (PCFCL-LC); all PCFCL-LC cases are uniformly GCB, while PC-DLBCL, leg type shows heterogeneous cell-of-origin classification [22]. A high prevalence of gain-of-function mutations in MYD88 (MYD88 L265P) and CD79B genes has been reported in PC-DLBCL, leg type and is associated with inferior clinical outcomes [4,12,20,23]. In a report of 61 patients (58 interpretable), MYD88 L265P was detected in 59% of patients with PC-DLBCL, leg type and was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival; the 3-year and 5-year disease-specific survival rates for those with the mutation were 66% and 60%, respectively, compared to 85% and 72% for wild-type [23]. GEP studies have identified that PC-DLBCL belongs to the MCD subtype (co-occurrence of MYD88 and CD79B gain-of-function mutations), which is associated with the ABC phenotype [4,12]. These findings support the use of multigene panel testing (MGPT) for MYD88 and CD79B mutations to help distinguish PC-DLBCL, leg type from PCFCL. IgM expression should be checked if MYD88 mutations are identified, as IgM positivity is likely associated with systemic involvement. The t(14;18) translocation (BCL2 rearrangement) is generally absent in PCFCL and its detection suggests systemic follicular lymphoma with secondary skin involvement [28,39]. MYC rearrangements are frequent in PC-DLBCL, leg type and absent in PCFCL [33].
Risk Factors Primary Cutaneous B Cell LymphomasClick to collapse
Anatomical site (leg)
PC-DLBCL, leg type is most commonly found on the leg, and PCFCL occurring on the leg has a higher relapse rate (63%) and lower 5-year disease-specific survival (44%) compared to PCFCL at other sites (relapse 25%, survival 99%) [48].
MYD88 L265P mutation
Present in 59% of PC-DLBCL, leg type; associated with shorter disease-specific survival and independent adverse prognostic factor for OS [23].
Inactivation of CDKN2A
Associated with inferior prognosis in PC-DLBCL, leg type [1].
Multiple skin lesions at presentation
In PC-DLBCL, leg type, multiple skin lesions are associated with worse prognosis [1].
Follicular growth pattern with CD10 and BCL2 strong expression
Suggests systemic follicular lymphoma rather than primary cutaneous disease; t(14;18) translocation detection also indicates systemic involvement [26-29].
Protective Factors Primary Cutaneous B Cell LymphomasClick to collapse
- Solitary lesion at presentation (associated with better outcome in PCFCL and PCMZL) [5]
- Trunk location for PCFCL (lower relapse rate compared to leg) [48]
Molecular Pathogenesis Mycosis Fungoides Sezary SyndromeClick to collapse
Genomic studies have demonstrated biologic diversity within MF and SS [4,11]. The cells of origin differ: MF arises from skin-resident effector memory T cells, while SS arises from thymic memory T cells, supporting distinct pathogenetic processes [4]. Immunophenotypically, MF and SS tumor cells are typically CD2+, CD3+, CD5+, CD4+, CD8-, CCR4+, TCR-beta+, and CD45RO+, with loss of CD7 and CD26 [27]. Variants include CD8+ MF (especially hypopigmented variant) and CD4/CD8 dual-negative variants (in LCT and hypopigmented cases) [28-30]. Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements are detected in most cases and are diagnostic aids, but they can also be present in non-malignant conditions and are not sufficient alone for diagnosis [32,33]. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) for TCR rearrangements is more sensitive and specific and can identify unique clone sequences for disease monitoring [34,35]. The loss of CCR4 expression and emergence of CCR4 genomic alterations may be associated with resistance to mogamulizumab [31]. JAK2 gene rearrangements are recognized as disease-defining genetic abnormalities in a subset of CTCL and can inform therapeutic decisions [PCLYM-B 2 of 2]. Large-cell transformation (LCT) is defined histologically as >25% large cells, and its incidence is strongly dependent on disease stage at diagnosis (1% in early-stage, 27% in stage IIB, 56%–67% in stage IV) [8-10]. LCT is an independent poor prognostic factor, with median OS of 35 months in SS patients with LCT vs. 80 months without [22]. CD30 expression is seen in 30%–50% of LCT cases and may have implications for CD30-directed therapies [8-10,222]. Other recurrent mutations include TP53, NOTCH1, and epigenetic modifiers but specific frequencies were not detailed in the source.
Risk Factors Mycosis Fungoides Sezary SyndromeClick to collapse
Age at presentation
Older age (≥60 years) is an independent poor prognostic factor for OS in advanced-stage MF/SS [16,21].
Advanced T classification (skin involvement)
T3 (tumor) and T4 (erythroderma) are associated with worse prognosis; limited patch/plaque (T1) has excellent prognosis [18,19].
Extracutaneous disease (lymph node, visceral involvement)
Presence of LN involvement (N3) or visceral involvement (M1) is associated with significantly shorter survival [16,21].
Large-cell transformation (LCT)
Independent poor prognostic factor for OS; median OS 35 months in SS with LCT vs. 80 months without [22]. Incidence higher in advanced-stage disease [8-10].
Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
Identified as independent prognostic marker in CLIC study; used in prognostic model [21].
Peripheral blood involvement (B2)
High blood tumor burden (B2) defines SS and is associated with worse prognosis [14,21].
Folliculotropic MF (FMF)
Higher risk of disease progression; less responsive to topical therapies; advanced-stage cutaneous disease associated with worse prognosis [7-9,218-220].
HTLV-1 infection
HTLV-1 positivity can impact therapy (rapid progression with pembrolizumab); also helps exclude ATLL [MFSS-1 footnote i, MFSS-A 9 of 12 footnote e].
Protective Factors Mycosis Fungoides Sezary SyndromeClick to collapse
- Limited skin involvement (T1, patch only) with excellent prognosis [18,19]
- Early-stage disease (IA) with very high 5-year survival [18]
- Absence of LCT at diagnosis [22]
- Normal LDH levels [21]
Molecular Pathogenesis Primary Cutaneous Cd30 T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse
PCTLD are characterized by the immunophenotype CD30+ (>75% cells), CD4+, with variable loss of CD2, CD5, CD3, and CD8+ (<5%) expression; cytotoxic granule-associated proteins are positive [1,2]. ALK positivity and the t(2;5) translocation are typically absent in PC-ALCL and LyP, helping distinguish them from systemic ALCL [274,275]. GATA3 expression by IHC has been proposed to differentiate between MF-LCT and CD30+ PCTLD: MF-LCT shows strong/diffuse GATA3 expression while PCTLD shows variable/moderate expression [276]. MUM1 expression is valuable to distinguish LyP from PC-ALCL, as 87% of LyP cases are MUM1-positive compared to only 20% of PC-ALCL [277]. DUSP22-IRF4 (6p25.3) gene rearrangement has been described in patients with PC-ALCL and LyP but is not associated with prognostic significance [279-281]. In a large multicenter study, FISH for IRF4 had a specificity of 99% and positive predictive value of 90% for cutaneous ALCL [279]. Abnormal T-cell phenotype and perforin expression are significantly more frequent in PC-ALCL than in transformed MF and may be useful for differential diagnosis [278]. Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements are detected in most cases of both PC-ALCL and LyP, but may not be demonstrated in all cases and can be seen in non-malignant conditions. Demonstration of identical clones in skin, blood, and/or lymph nodes may be helpful in selected cases. The identification of clonal TCR gene rearrangement has no definitive established prognostic value but may help determine clinical staging or assess relapsed or residual disease [PCLYM-B 1 of 2].
Risk Factors Primary Cutaneous Cd30 T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse
Age ≥60 years
In PC-ALCL, age ≥60 years is predictive of lower OS rates [263].
Multiple cutaneous lesions at presentation
In PC-ALCL, presence of multiple skin lesions, extensive skin lesions on leg, early cutaneous relapse, and nodal progression are associated with poorer outcomes [264-266].
Extensive skin lesions on leg
Associated with worse outcome in PC-ALCL [264].
Older age
In LyP, older age associated with increased risk of disease progression to lymphoma [268,270].
Positive TCR gene rearrangement in LyP
In LyP, positive TCR gene rearrangement associated with progression to lymphoma [268,270].
Mixed-type LyP
Associated with increased risk of progression to lymphoma [268,270].
Lymphomatoid drug reactions
Certain drugs (amlodipine, carbamazepine, cefuroxime, valsartan) linked to CD30+ atypical large cells histologically; must be distinguished from PCTLD [PCTLD/INTRO-1].
Protective Factors Primary Cutaneous Cd30 T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse
- Primary cutaneous disease (absence of systemic involvement) [258,259]
- Spontaneous regression of lesions (common in LyP) [1]
- Solitary or localized lesions in PC-ALCL (better prognosis than multifocal) [266]
- Absence of extracutaneous spread [258,259]
Molecular Pathogenesis Subcutaneous Panniculitis Like T Cell LymphomaClick to collapse
SPTCL is characterized by mature, medium-sized, CD8+ activated T cells with alpha/beta TCR expression [1,2]. The immunophenotype is typically CD3+, CD8+, βF1+, CD2+, CD5+, CD7+, TIA1+, granzyme B+, perforin+, with high Ki-67 staining [4,13,22]. Adipocyte rimming by CD8+ T-cells is a hallmark feature. Unlike many lymphomas, SPTCL lacks common lymphoma driver mutations; instead, it is frequently associated with germline mutations in the HAVCR2 gene, which encodes TIM-3 (T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain protein 3), an immune checkpoint molecule [24,30]. HAVCR2 germline mutations (including Y82C, I97M, and T101I) are present in 25%–85% of patients with SPTCL and are more prevalent in patients of Asian ancestry [24,31-33]. These mutations lead to unchecked T-cell activation and increased risk of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) [14,15,31,34,35]. Recurrent somatic mutations in genes involved in epigenetic modification (KMT2C and KMT2D) and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (PLCG1 and ARID1B) have also been identified [22,29]. The presence of HAVCR2 mutations confers resistance to CHOP chemotherapy, necessitating treatment with immunosuppressive regimens or hematopoietic cell transplant [33]. HAVCR2 mutations can help distinguish SPTCL from benign mimics such as lupus erythematosus panniculitis [36]. EBER-ISH is typically negative in SPTCL, distinguishing it from PCGD-TCL, which is often EBV-positive [9,13,16,25-27]. Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements are present [22,28].
Risk Factors Subcutaneous Panniculitis Like T Cell LymphomaClick to collapse
HAVCR2 germline mutation
Germline mutations in HAVCR2 (Y82C, I97M, T101I) found in 25-85% of SPTCL cases. More prevalent in Asian ancestry. Associated with TIM-3 dysfunction, HLH, and refractory disease [24,30-33].
Personal or family history of autoimmune disorders
Personal or family history of SLE or other autoimmune disorders commonly reported in SPTCL patients [SPTCL/INTRO-1, 4-7].
Asian ancestry
HAVCR2 mutations appear to be more prevalent in patients of Asian ancestry [24,31-33].
Young age
SPTCL tends to occur in younger individuals compared to other CTCLs [SPTCL/INTRO-1].
Female sex
Slight female predominance in SPTCL [4-7].
Protective Factors Subcutaneous Panniculitis Like T Cell LymphomaClick to collapse
- Absence of HLH at presentation (better 5-year survival ~80% vs. ~46% with HLH) [1,4,14]
- Low tumor burden (localized or limited subcutaneous disease) [SPTCL-3]
- Early-stage disease with indolent course
Molecular Pathogenesis Primary Cutaneous Indolent T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse
PCSM-TLPD and PCA-TLPD are both characterized by clonal T-cell populations detected by TCR gene rearrangement studies (TRB/TRG) in most cases [5,6]. PCSM-TLPD shows a CD4+ T-follicular helper (TFH) phenotype with expression of PD-1, ICOS, and variable BCL6 and CXCL13, but is typically CD10-negative [5]. Concurrent immunoglobulin gene rearrangements may be detected in PCSM-TLPD [5]. The immunophenotype helps distinguish it from other T-cell lymphomas with TFH phenotype (e.g., angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma) and from systemic involvement by PTCL-NOS. PCA-TLPD expresses CD8 and a cytotoxic phenotype (TIA+, granzyme B+/-), with a unique dot-like expression of CD68 in tumor cells [6]. Both entities are EBV-negative by EBER-ISH. The lack of aggressive molecular features and the excellent prognosis support the reclassification as lymphoproliferative disorders rather than malignant lymphomas [1-4]. The pathogenesis is not fully understood but likely involves immune dysregulation rather than frank malignant transformation. Recurrent somatic mutations have not been systematically identified in these rare entities. Clonal TRB/TRG gene rearrangements without cytologic, histopathologic, and immunophenotypic evidence of abnormal T-cell population do not constitute a diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoma, as they can be identified in non-malignant conditions [PCLYM-B 1 of 2]. Conversely, a negative result does not exclude the diagnosis. In cases that are not behaving indolently (e.g., generalized skin lesions, rapidly growing tumors, or loss of pan T-cell markers), alternative diagnoses such as cutaneous manifestations of PTCL should be considered [INCTLD-1].
Risk Factors Primary Cutaneous Indolent T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse
No established risk factors identified
The source does not describe specific risk factors for PCSM-TLPD or PCA-TLPD beyond their association with indolent behavior and excellent prognosis.
Protective Factors Primary Cutaneous Indolent T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse
- Solitary presentation (no generalized skin lesions)
- Typical histologic and immunophenotypic features allowing diagnosis as LPD rather than malignant CTCL
- Indolent behavior with 5-year OS of 100% [5,6]