Cutaneous Lymphoma

Archetype F 33 regimens (Main Regimens) cutaneous_lymphoma

Mycosis fungoides, Sezary syndrome, and primary cutaneous lymphomas

DefinitionClick to collapse

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (PC-BCL) are a group of extranodal B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas that originate in and are usually confined to the skin at diagnosis [1,4]. They account for approximately 29% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas and comprise three main subtypes: primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL), primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL), and primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PC-DLBCL, leg type) [1,5]. PCFCL is the most common subtype (57% of PC-BCL), located primarily on the scalp, face, forehead, and trunk, typically presenting as solitary, firm, pink to violaceous papules, nodules, plaques, or tumors; ulceration is rare and multifocal lesions occur in about 15% of cases [1,2]. It follows an indolent course with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate exceeding 95% [1,2]. PCMZL (also termed primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoproliferative disorder in the International Consensus Classification) is the second most common subtype (24%–31% of PC-BCL), with distribution primarily on the trunk, upper extremities, and head; it presents as solitary or multiple erythematous to violaceous papules, small nodules, plaques, or tumors and has an excellent prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 99% [1]. The rarest subtype is PC-DLBCL, leg type (11%–19% of PC-BCL, 4% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas), which is distributed mostly to the leg but can occur at other sites in 10%–15% of cases; it typically appears as red to bluish plaques or tumors that can ulcerate and is aggressive with a poor prognosis (5-year OS rate of 50%) due to frequent extracutaneous relapses [1,2,3].

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and many clinicopathologic variants have been described [1,2]. MF is characterized by malignant transformation of skin-resident effector memory T cells and typically exhibits an indolent clinical course with intermittent, stable, or slow progression of skin lesions. Extracutaneous involvement may be seen in advanced stages, including lymph nodes (LNs), blood, or less commonly other organs [1,2]. Sézary syndrome (SS) is the leukemic variant of CTCL, closely related to MF but with unique characteristics. SS is rare, accounting for less than 5% of cutaneous lymphomas, and predominantly affects older individuals [1-3]. SS is characterized by the presence of atypical T cells (Sézary cells) in the skin causing diffuse erythema (erythroderma) and significant blood involvement with more than 1,000 abnormal cells/µL, defined as Sézary cells by cytopathologic assessment or flow cytometry (abnormal subsets including but not limited to CD4+CD7- or CD4+CD26- cells); TRBC1 may contribute in detecting clonality and can improve specificity when CD7 and CD26 are lost [3]. SS is thought to arise from thymic memory T cells, while MF arises from skin-resident effector memory T cells, supporting the contention that SS is a process distinct from MF [4]. Cases presenting as an overlap of these two conditions exist. The diagnostic workup includes biopsy of suspicious skin sites with immunohistochemistry (CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD20, CD30) and molecular analysis to detect clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements [5]. Large-cell transformation (LCT) of MF is defined histologically as more than 25% of tumor cells displaying large size; CD30 expression may be seen but is not part of the definition of LCT [6].

Primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (PCTLD) represent a spectrum that includes primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL), lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP), and 'borderline' cases with overlapping clinical and histopathologic features [1-3]. Clinical correlation with histopathologic features is essential for diagnosis; it cannot be made based on pathology alone. It is critical to distinguish these from other processes expressing CD30, including systemic T-cell lymphomas (e.g., systemic ALCL, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma [ATLL], PTCL), other CD30+ cutaneous lymphomas such as MF with large-cell transformation (MF-LCT), and benign disorders such as lymphomatoid drug reactions, arthropod bites, and viral infections [1,2]. Lymphomatoid drug reactions have been linked with certain drugs (e.g., amlodipine, carbamazepine, cefuroxime, valsartan) and may show CD30+ atypical large cells histologically. MF and primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell LPD can coexist in the same patient. PC-ALCL represents about 8% of cutaneous lymphoma cases [1]. Unlike systemic ALCL, PC-ALCL typically follows an indolent course; although cutaneous relapses are common, an excellent prognosis is usually maintained [4,5]. Histologically, PC-ALCL shows diffuse, cohesive sheets of large CD30+ (>75%) cells with anaplastic, pleomorphic, or immunoblastic appearance [1]. Clinical features typically include solitary or localized nodules or tumors (often ulcerated); multifocal lesions occur in about 20% of cases. Extracutaneous disease occurs in about 10% of cases, usually involving regional lymph nodes [1]. LyP is included under the WHO-EORTC classification but may be best classified as a lymphoproliferative disorder due to its frequently spontaneously regressing nature [1]. LyP is associated with other lymphomas such as MF, PC-ALCL, systemic ALCL, or Hodgkin lymphoma [6,7]. LyP is histologically heterogeneous with large atypical anaplastic, immunoblastic, or Hodgkin-like cells in a marked inflammatory background [1]. Clinical features are characterized by chronic, recurrent, spontaneously regressing papulonodular (grouped or generalized) skin lesions [1,6].

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) is a very rare subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma characterized by mature, medium-sized, CD8+ activated T cells with tropism towards adipocytes in the subcutaneous tissue and, in extraordinary cases, involving adipocytes at other sites like the mesentery [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. It accounts for less than 1% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas, with a 5-year survival average of approximately 80% [4]. Patients with SPTCL tend to be young, often with a personal or family history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or other autoimmune disorders [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. The presentation includes non-ulcerated deep nodules typically involving the legs and other sites. The process may resolve with areas of lipodystrophy and hyperpigmentation. Fever and malaise are commonly observed at presentation. Signs and symptoms of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) may occasionally lead to severe morbidity or mortality; markers of HLH should be checked when SPTCL is suspected, with ferritin levels as a reliable marker to assess disease evolution [SPTCL/INTRO-1, TCLYM-F]. Rimming of bone marrow adipocytes by CD8+ T cells may be observed, but tumoral growth in nodal, bone marrow, or mesenchymal organs is not typically seen [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. This limited growth potential, along with the lack of common lymphoma driver mutations and the frequent detection of germline mutations in the HAVCR2 gene, suggests an immune dysregulation characterized by unchecked activated T cells driving the process [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. HAVCR2 encodes for T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain protein 3 (TIM-3), a membrane modulator of immune response resulting in hemophagocytosis and uncontrolled activation of the innate immune system. HAVCR2 mutations appear to be more prevalent in patients of Asian ancestry [SPTCL/INTRO-1, 24,31-33].

Primary cutaneous indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) were previously classified as primary cutaneous lymphomas but, due to their excellent prognosis and absence of extracutaneous progression, have been re-classified as LPD by both 2022 WHO classification and International Consensus Classification (ICC) [1-4]. They should be distinguished from malignant CTCL. The primary cutaneous indolent LPDs include primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell LPD (PCSM-TLPD) [5] and primary cutaneous CD8+ acral T-cell LPD (PCA-TLPD) [6]. PCSM-TLPD typically presents as solitary asymptomatic nodule or plaque on the head and neck, trunk, or upper extremities; spontaneous regression is common. Histology shows superficial band-like or nodular/diffuse infiltrate of predominantly small/medium-sized CD4+ T cells with a T-follicular helper (TFH) phenotype (CD3+, CD4+, CD8-, PD-1+, ICOS+, BCL6-/+, CXCL13-/+) and admixed reactive CD8+ T cells, B cells, plasma cells, and histiocytes [5]. PCA-TLPD presents as solitary asymptomatic papule, nodule, or plaque on ear, nose, or other acral sites; spontaneous regression is less common but can occur. Histology shows dermal, non-epidermotropic, diffuse or nodular infiltrate of atypical medium-sized CD8+ T cells with cytotoxic phenotype (CD3+, CD4-, CD8+, TIA+, granzyme B+/-, dot-like expression of CD68 in tumor cells, TCR alpha/beta) [6]. Both disorders have clonal TRB/TRG gene rearrangements in most cases. The 5-year overall survival rate is 100% for both PCSM-TLPD and PCA-TLPD; relapse is rare for PCSM-TLPD and uncommon for PCA-TLPD [5,6].

EpidemiologyClick to collapse

SubtypesClick to collapse

57% of PC-BCL
Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL)

Most common subtype (57% of PC-BCL). Located primarily on scalp, face, forehead, and trunk. Presents as solitary, firm, pink to violaceous papules, nodules, plaques, or tumors. Multifocal lesions in ~15% of cases. Ulceration rare. Indolent course with excellent prognosis (5-year OS >95%). Dissemination to extracutaneous sites extremely uncommon. Cutaneous recurrences occur near initial site in ~30% of cases. Immunophenotype: CD20+, CD79a+, BCL6+, surface Ig light chain positive, cytoplasmic Ig light chain negative; CD10 can be negative in diffuse growth pattern; BCL2 usually negative or minimally expressed. Most frequently germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype [4]. Can present with mixed nodular/diffuse or purely diffuse pattern mimicking DLBCL.

24%–31% of PC-BCL
Primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL)

Second most common subtype (24%–31% of PC-BCL). Distribution primarily on trunk, upper extremities, and head. Presents as solitary or multiple erythematous to violaceous papules, small nodules, plaques, or tumors. Indolent course with excellent prognosis (5-year survival 99%). Relapses in skin occur in 50% of patients. Immunophenotype: CD10-, BCL6-, BCL2+, CD20+, CD79a+. IgG4 expressed in about one-third of cases. Divided into two groups based on IgH gene rearrangement: 1) CXCR3-negative, Ig class-switched subtype (IgG, IgA, IgE) with nodular plasma cell infiltrates; 2) less common CXCR3-positive, IgM-positive (non class-switched) subtype that may have extracutaneous extension [5-8]. IgG class-switched subtype is a clonal chronic lymphoproliferative disorder with indolent course.

11%–19% of PC-BCL; 4% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas
Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PC-DLBCL, leg type)

Rarest subtype (11%–19% of PC-BCL; 4% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas). Distributed mostly to leg; 10%–15% occur at other sites. Presents as red to bluish plaques or tumors that can ulcerate. Aggressive course with poor prognosis (5-year OS rate 50%) due to high frequency of extracutaneous relapses [2,3]. Immunophenotype: CD20+, CD79a+, monotypic immunoglobulins, BCL2 (strong), IRF4/MUM1+, FOXP1+, IgM+, occasionally MYC+. CD10 usually negative. Most commonly activated B-cell (ABC) subtype by gene expression profiling. Gain-of-function mutations in MYD88 and CD79B co-occur in the 'MCD' subtype, specific to PC-DLBCL, leg type [4]. Inactivation of CDKN2A and MYD88 L265P associated with inferior prognosis.

Most common CTCL (accounting for majority of cases)
Mycosis fungoides (MF)

Most common CTCL. Presents with patches, plaques, tumors, or erythroderma. Indolent course, slow progression. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD4+, CD8- (rarely CD8+), CD7-, CD30-/+, cytotoxic granule proteins negative. Typical T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements. Histologic variants include folliculotropic MF (FMF), pagetoid reticulosis, granulomatous slack skin, and hypopigmented MF.

<5% of cutaneous lymphomas
Sézary syndrome (SS)

Leukemic variant. Characterized by erythroderma (confluence of erythema ≥80% BSA) and significant blood involvement (B2: ≥1,000 Sézary cells/µL). Arises from thymic memory T cells. Presents with diffuse erythema, lymphadenopathy, and pruritus. Flow cytometry shows expanded CD4+ cells with loss of CD7 and/or CD26. Clonal TRB/TRG rearrangement identical to skin clone. Rare (<5% of cutaneous lymphomas). Predominantly older individuals.

Variants of MF; specific incidence not specified
Folliculotropic MF (FMF)

Histologic variant of MF characterized by infiltration of hair follicles by atypical T lymphocytes. Presents as folliculocentric papules, nodules, or areas of alopecia on any hair-bearing area. Two distinct patterns: early-stage (indolent, favorable prognosis) and advanced-stage (worse prognosis). Skin biopsy reaching deep dermis needed.

Rare variant of MF
Pagetoid reticulosis

Unilesional variant of MF with excellent prognosis. Presents as solitary, slowly enlarging patch or plaque, typically on extremities. Histology shows epidermotropic atypical T cells ('pagetoid' spread).

Very rare
Granulomatous slack skin

Rare variant of MF presenting with redundant skin resembling cutis laxa on flexural areas. Characterized by granulomatous infiltrate.

~8% of cutaneous lymphoma cases; second most common CTCL after MF
Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL)

Represents about 8% of cutaneous lymphoma cases. Histologically characterized by diffuse, cohesive sheets of large CD30-positive (in >75%) cells with anaplastic, pleomorphic, or immunoblastic appearance. Clinical features typically include solitary or localized nodules or tumors (often ulcerated); multifocal lesions occur in about 20% of cases. Extracutaneous disease occurs in about 10% of cases, usually involving regional LNs. Patches and plaques may also be present; some degree of spontaneous remission may occur. Indolent course with excellent prognosis; cutaneous relapses common. Immunophenotype: CD30+ (>75% cells), CD4+, variable loss of CD2/CD5/CD3, CD8+ (<5%), cytotoxic granule proteins positive. ALK positivity and t(2;5) typically absent. DUSP22-IRF4 rearrangement described but not prognostic.

Rare; specific incidence not given
Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP)

Included under WHO-EORTC classification but best classified as a lymphoproliferative disorder due to frequent spontaneous regression. Histologically heterogeneous with large atypical anaplastic, immunoblastic, or Hodgkin-like cells in a marked inflammatory background; several histologic subtypes defined. Clinical features: chronic, recurrent, spontaneously regressing papulonodular (grouped or generalized) skin lesions. Not considered a malignant disorder. Excellent prognosis (OS rate 92% at 5 and 10 years). Associated with increased risk of secondary lymphomas (MF, PC-ALCL, systemic ALCL, Hodgkin lymphoma) [267-272]. Older age, positive TCR gene rearrangement, or mixed-type LyP may be prognostic for progression to lymphoma [268,270].

<1% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas; very rare
Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, alpha/beta type

The only subtype recognized as SPTCL in current classifications (WHO5 and ICC after 2008 reclassification). Characterized by mature, medium-sized, CD8+ activated T cells with tropism towards adipocytes. Presents as non-ulcerated deep nodules typically involving legs and other sites. Indolent course in most cases. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD8+, βF1+, CD2+, CD5+, CD7+, TIA1+, granzyme B+, perforin+. Typically EBER-ISH negative. Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements present. HAVCR2 germline mutations (Y82C, I97M, T101I) found in 25-85% of cases, more prevalent in Asian ancestry. Limited growth potential; no common lymphoma driver mutations. May be associated with HLH (~15-25% of cases), which confers worse prognosis (5-year survival ~46%).

Even rarer than SPTCL
Primary cutaneous gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma (PCGD-TCL) with panniculitis-like features

Previously considered part of SPTCL but now classified separately. More aggressive phenotype. Typically presents with panniculitis-like lesions but has gamma/delta TCR expression. Median age older, more likely male, significantly higher risk of death than SPTCL (HR 5.00, P = .005) [10]. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD4-, CD8-, TCR gamma/delta+, often CD56+. EBER-ISH often positive. Not associated with HAVCR2 mutations. Worse prognosis.

Rare; exact frequency not specified
Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (PCSM-TLPD)

Solitary asymptomatic nodule or plaque; common locations: head and neck, trunk, upper extremities. No extracutaneous progression. Histology: superficial band-like or nodular/diffuse infiltrate of predominantly small/medium-sized CD4+ T cells with reactive infiltrate of admixed CD8+ T cells, B cells, plasma cells, and histiocytes including multinucleated giant cells. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD4+, CD8-, CD10-, PD-1+, ICOS+, BCL6-/+, CXCL13-/+, TCR alpha/beta. Clonal TRB/TRG gene rearrangements in most cases; sometimes concomitant clonal Ig gene rearrangements present. 5-year OS rate 100%; relapse is rare. Spontaneous remission common.

Rare; exact frequency not specified
Primary cutaneous CD8+ acral T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (PCA-TLPD)

Solitary asymptomatic papule, nodule, or plaque; common locations: ear, nose, or other acral sites. No extracutaneous progression. Histology: dermal, non-epidermotropic, diffuse or nodular infiltrate of atypical medium-sized CD8+ T cells. Immunophenotype: CD3+, CD4-, CD8+, TIA+, granzyme B+/-, dot-like expression of CD68 in tumor cells, TCR alpha/beta, EBV negative. Clonal TRB/TRG gene rearrangements in most cases. 5-year OS rate 100%; relapse is uncommon. Spontaneous remission less common but can occur.

Clinical FeaturesClick to collapse

Typical Presentation

Cutaneous lymphomas encompass a heterogeneous group of extranodal B-cell and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas originating in the skin. The most common subtypes include mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (PC-BCLs), primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (PCTLDs), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL), and primary cutaneous indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). MF typically presents with patches, plaques, or tumors that follow an indolent course, with involvement often limited to the skin for years [MFSS/INTRO-1]. SS is a rare leukemic variant characterized by diffuse erythema (erythroderma covering ≥80% BSA), significant blood involvement with >1000 Sézary cells/μL, and often lymphadenopathy [MFSS/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (PCFCL) is the most common PC-BCL (57%), presenting as solitary, firm, pink to violaceous papules, nodules, or plaques on the scalp, face, forehead, or trunk, with an indolent course and 5-year overall survival (OS) >95% [CUTB/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (PCMZL) accounts for 24%–31% of PC-BCLs, with solitary or multiple erythematous to violaceous papules, small nodules, or plaques on the trunk, upper extremities, or head, and a 5-year survival of 99% [CUTB/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PC-DLBCL, leg type) is the rarest PC-BCL (11%–19%), presenting as red to bluish plaques or tumors on one or both legs (or other sites in 10%–15%), often ulcerated, with aggressive behavior and a 5-year OS of 50% [CUTB/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL) typically presents as solitary or localized nodules or tumors (often ulcerated); multifocal lesions occur in about 20% of cases; it follows an indolent course with excellent prognosis [PCTLD/INTRO-1]. Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is characterized by chronic, recurrent, spontaneously regressing papulonodular (grouped or generalized) skin lesions [PCTLD/INTRO-1]. SPTCL presents with non-ulcerated deep nodules, typically involving the legs and other sites, often accompanied by fever and malaise; it may resolve with lipodystrophy and hyperpigmentation [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell LPD (PCSM-TLPD) presents as solitary asymptomatic nodule or plaque on head, neck, trunk, or upper extremities, with no extracutaneous progression and a 5-year OS of 100% [INCTLD-2]. Primary cutaneous CD8+ acral T-cell LPD (PCA-TLPD) presents as solitary asymptomatic papule, nodule, or plaque on ears, nose, or other acral sites, with no extracutaneous progression and a 5-year OS of 100% [INCTLD-2].

Symptoms

Common
Pruritus

Nearly 90% of patients with CTCL experience pruritus, which can significantly impact quality of life [MFSS-B]. It may be localized or generalized and often correlates with disease sites.

Variable
Fever and malaise

Fever and malaise are commonly observed at presentation in SPTCL, especially when hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is present [SPTCL/INTRO-1]. Systemic B symptoms (fever, night sweats, weight loss) can occur in advanced MF/SS or PC-DLBCL.

Common
Asymptomatic nodules/plaques

Many indolent cutaneous lymphomas (e.g., PCFCL, PCMZL, indolent T-cell LPD) present with asymptomatic skin lesions that may be discovered incidentally.

Signs

Uncommon (SS, advanced MF)
Erythroderma

Confluence of erythema covering ≥80% BSA, characteristic of SS and erythrodermic MF [MFSS-3A]. Associated with keratoderma, ectropion, and leg edema.

Variable by subtype
Tumors

Solid or nodular lesions ≥1 cm in diameter with depth/vertical growth. Common in tumor-stage MF (T3) and PC-ALCL.

Uncommon overall, more frequent in aggressive subtypes
Ulceration

Ulceration of tumors occurs in PC-ALCL and PC-DLBCL, leg type, and may indicate aggressive disease or necrotic tumors in SPTCL.

Uncommon (FMF variant)
Folliculocentric papules/nodules

Seen in folliculotropic MF (FMF), often with alopecia in hair-bearing areas [MFSS/INTRO-1].

Variable
Hypopigmented or hyperpigmented patches

Lesions may be hypo- or hyperpigmented, particularly in MF variants. Hypopigmented MF is more common in younger patients and those with skin of color.

Red FlagsClick to collapse

InvestigationsClick to collapse

Diagnostic

Skin biopsy (punch, incisional, or excisional)

Essential for histopathologic diagnosis; multiple biopsies may be needed to capture variability. Preferable to shave biopsy for deep dermal infiltrates.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) panel

To establish lineage and subtype. For MF/SS: includes CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD20, CD30 [MFSS-1]. For PC-BCL: includes CD20, CD3, CD10, BCL2, BCL6, IRF4/MUM1 [CUTB-1]. For PCTLD: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD30, CD56, ALK [PCTLD-1]. For SPTCL: TCR beta, TCR delta, CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD30, CD56 [SPTCL-1].

Molecular analysis for clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements

Supports T-cell clonality; high-throughput sequencing (HTS) offers higher sensitivity and allows clone tracking.

Flow cytometry of peripheral blood

For assessment of blood involvement in MF/SS; quantifies aberrant T cells (CD4+CD7- or CD4+CD26-). Also useful for detecting clonal TRBC1 expression.

Sézary cell preparation

May be useful if flow cytometry is non-diagnostic, though subjective.

Staging

Integrated whole body FDG-PET/CT (preferred) or C/A/P CT with contrast

For MF/SS: recommended for ≥T2b, LCT, FMF, palpable adenopathy, or abnormal labs; consider for T2a [MFSS-2]. For PC-BCL: CT and/or PET/CT to rule out systemic disease; may be omitted if clinically indicated for indolent subtypes [CUTB-1]. For PC-ALCL: C/A/P CT or FDG-PET/CT [PCTLD-2]. For SPTCL: whole body FDG-PET/CT to assess extracutaneous involvement [SPTCL-1].

Chest/abdomen/pelvis CT with contrast

Alternative to PET/CT; may be sufficient for some subtypes. Neck CT with contrast useful if whole body PET not done [MFSS-2].

Bone marrow biopsy

Not routinely required for MF/SS; consider for unexplained cytopenias. For PC-DLBCL, leg type, it is essential due to aggressive nature. For SPTCL, consider if unexplained cytopenias or HLH [CUTB-1, MFSS-2, SPTCL-1].

Lymph node biopsy

For clinically abnormal nodes (>1.5 cm longest diameter). Excisional or core needle biopsy preferred; FNA alone insufficient [MFSS-2, PCTLD-2].

Pregnancy testing

Many treatments are contraindicated in pregnancy.

Biomarkers

TRB and TRG gene rearrangement testing (by PCR or HTS)

Essential for confirming T-cell clonality; HTS allows precise identification and monitoring.

MYD88 L265P and CD79B mutation testing (MGPT or FISH)

Distinguishes PC-DLBCL, leg type (MYD88 L265P positive) from PCFCL; associated with inferior prognosis [CUTB/INTRO-2, Discussion MS-4].

DUSP22-IRF4 gene rearrangement (FISH)

Detected in PC-ALCL and LyP; high specificity for PC-ALCL [PCLYM-B 1 of 2].

JAK2 gene rearrangements (MGPT or FISH)

Disease-defining genetic abnormality in CTCL; can inform therapeutic decisions [PCLYM-B 2 of 2].

HTLV-1/2 serology

To exclude adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), which can present with skin lesions.

HAVCR2 germline mutation testing

Detects mutations associated with SPTCL and HLH; more prevalent in Asian ancestry.

StagingClick to collapse

For MF and SS: TNMB classification and clinical staging as per ISCL/EORTC 2022 update (Olsen et al. Blood 2022) [MFSS-3, MFSS-4]. For PC-BCL and other cutaneous lymphomas (excluding MF/SS): TNM classification [CUTB-A]. For PCTLD, the same TNM classification applies. For SPTCL, no formal staging system is used; staging is based on presence of HLH and tumor burden (localized vs. widespread). For primary cutaneous indolent LPD, staging involves physical exam and palpation of LNs; no other staging required if typical presentation [INCTLD-2].

T Categories

StageDescription
T0Absence of clinically suspicious lesions (used for clinical trials to track clearance).
T1Patches, papules, and/or plaques covering <10% BSA. Subclassified: T1a (patch only), T1b (plaque/papule ± patch) [MFSS-3].
T2Patches, papules, and/or plaques covering ≥10% BSA. Subclassified: T2a (patch only), T2b (plaque ± patch) [MFSS-3].
T3One or more tumors ≥1 cm in diameter (solid/nodular lesion with depth) [MFSS-3].
T4Confluence of erythema covering ≥80% BSA (erythroderma) [MFSS-3].

N Categories

StageDescription
N0No clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes; no biopsy necessary.
N1Clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes; Dutch grade 1 or NCI LN0-2. Subclassified: N1a (clone negative or equivocal), N1b (clone positive and identical to skin) [MFSS-3].
N2Clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes; Dutch grade 2 or NCI LN3. Subclassified: N2a (clone negative/equivocal), N2b (clone positive and identical to skin) [MFSS-3].
N3Clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes; Dutch grade 3-4 or NCI LN4. Subclassified: N3a (clone negative/equivocal), N3b (clone positive and identical to skin) [MFSS-3].
NXClinically abnormal peripheral or central LN but no pathologic determination; surrogate means may be used per Tri-Society consensus [MFSS-3].

M Categories

StageDescription
M0No visceral involvement.
M1aBone marrow involvement only: clone positive and identical to skin (or negative/indeterminate) [MFSS-3].
M1bNon-bone marrow visceral involvement: clone positive and identical to skin (or negative/indeterminate) [MFSS-3].
MXVisceral involvement neither confirmed nor refuted by available pathologic or imaging assessment [MFSS-3].

Stage Groupings

GroupCriteriaClinical MeaningFive Yr SurvivalTreatment Intent
IAT1, N0, M0, B0 or B1Limited skin involvement alone (<10% BSA). Excellent prognosis; most patients treated with skin-directed therapies alone.>95% (from literature, not explicitly stated in guideline but implied by excellent prognosis and indolent course)Curative/palliative with skin-directed therapy; systemic therapy reserved for selected cases.
IBT2, N0, M0, B0 or B1Skin-only disease with ≥10% BSA. May be patch or plaque disease. Good prognosis, but higher burden may require systemic therapy.Approximately 85-90% (estimated from CLIC data)Curative/palliative; skin-directed therapy first; consider systemic therapy for higher burden.
IIAT1-2, N1-2, M0, B0 or B1Skin disease (any T1-2) with lymph node involvement (non-bulky). Prognosis intermediate.Approximately 70-80% (estimated)Palliative; skin-directed plus systemic therapy as needed; often combined approach.
IIBT3, N0-2, M0, B0 or B1Tumor stage disease (one or more tumors). Higher risk of progression and LCT. Prognosis worse than plaque-stage.Approximately 50-60% (from CLIC data for advanced MF)Palliative; systemic therapy ± RT; consider allogeneic HCT in eligible patients with refractory disease.
IIIAT4, N0-2, M0, B0Erythrodermic disease without significant blood involvement. Risk of secondary infections and progression.Approximately 40-50% (from CLIC data)Palliative; systemic therapy with or without ECP; supportive care critical.
IIIBT4, N0-2, M0, B1Erythrodermic disease with low blood tumor burden (B1).Similar to IIIAPalliative; systemic therapy including agents targeting blood involvement (e.g., mogamulizumab).
IVA1T1-4, N0-2, M0, B2Sézary syndrome (B2 blood involvement) without nodal involvement. Aggressive variant; requires systemic therapy.Approximately 30-40% (from CLIC data for SS)Palliative; systemic therapy as primary; consider allogeneic HCT in responding patients.
IVA2T1-4, N3, M0, B0-2Any skin involvement with bulky nodal disease (N3). High risk of progression.Approximately 25-35%Palliative; systemic therapy with multiagent chemotherapy may be considered; allogeneic HCT if eligible.
IVBT1-4, N0-3, M1a or M1b, B0-2Visceral disease (solid organ involvement). Poor prognosis; limited treatment options.Approximately 15-20% (from CLIC data)Palliative; systemic therapy; consider clinical trials and allogeneic HCT if disease controlled.

Staging Pearls

  • For MF/SS, blood involvement (B stage) is critical: B0 = <250/μL aberrant cells; B1 = does not meet B0 or B2; B2 = ≥1000/μL [MFSS-3A].
  • Lymph node assessment uses both Dutch grading and NCI-VA classification; clonal correlation with skin is essential for precise N staging [MFSS-5].
  • In PC-BCL, the TNM classification (CUTB-A) uses T staging based on number of lesions and body region involvement, not BSA. T1 = solitary lesion (<5 cm or ≥5 cm); T2 = multiple lesions limited to 1 or 2 contiguous body regions; T3 = generalized skin involvement (2 noncontiguous or ≥3 regions). N and M same as Ann Arbor [CUTB-A].
  • For SPTCL, formal staging is not used; HLH status and tumor burden (localized vs. widespread) guide treatment [SPTCL-2, SPTCL-3].
  • Large cell transformation (LCT) is a histologic feature that can occur at any stage and is independently associated with poorer prognosis; rebiopsy if suspected [MFSS-4 footnote].
  • Folliculotropic MF (FMF) is associated with higher risk of progression; histologic evidence may alter treatment approach even in early stage [MFSS-4 footnote].
  • Clinical staging integrates T, N, M, B categories as per MFSS-4 table. All recommendations are category 2A unless otherwise indicated.

Management PrinciplesClick to collapse

Cutaneous lymphomas are a heterogenous group of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas originating in the skin. The management philosophy emphasizes individualized, multimodal care coordinated by a multidisciplinary team (hematology/oncology, dermatology, pathology, radiation oncology) with expertise in cutaneous lymphomas, particularly at specialized centers [MFSS/INTRO-2]. Treatment goals are tailored to control symptoms, minimize risk of progression, and maintain quality of life. Durable remissions off therapy are uncommon; most patients experience relapse after discontinuation, so therapies with lower side-effect profiles and absence of cumulative toxicity are often used in an ongoing or maintenance fashion. Other than allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), therapies are not given with curative intent. Skin-directed therapies and systemic regimens that can be tolerated for longer durations are prioritized in earlier lines, moving to more toxic options only when necessary. Responses often differ across compartments (skin, blood, lymph nodes, viscera) due to variable drug penetration, so treatment decisions are guided by clinical assessment of the dominant disease compartment and symptom burden rather than uniform criteria [MFSS/INTRO-2]. In patients requiring chemotherapy, single agents are preferred over combination chemotherapy due to higher toxicity of multiagent regimens and short-lived responses [MFSS/INTRO-2].

Curative (selected cases)

Patients with localized disease suitable for definitive RT or surgical excision (e.g., unilesional MF, solitary PC-ALCL, limited PC-BCL)

Definitive involved-site radiation therapy (ISRT) or complete surgical excision, often with curative intent. For PC-DLBCL leg type, chemoimmunotherapy plus RT is used with curative intent. Allogeneic HCT may be considered for selected patients with advanced MF/SS or SPTCL who achieve response prior to transplant.

Disease control and symptom palliation

Most patients with MF/SS (early- and advanced-stage), indolent PC-BCL, PC-ALCL with multifocal lesions, LyP, SPTCL without HLH, and relapsed/refractory disease

Sequential use of skin-directed therapies (topical corticosteroids, mechlorethamine, phototherapy, RT) and systemic agents (retinoids, interferons, HDAC inhibitors, mogamulizumab, brentuximab vedotin, ECP) aimed at reducing disease burden and symptom relief. Systemic therapy is often combined with skin-directed therapy to maximize responses. Maintenance or tapering is considered for those with clinical benefit.

Control of life-threatening complications

Patients with SPTCL and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), or aggressive LCT with extracutaneous disease

Etoposide-based combination chemotherapy is recommended to control HLH first, then move to disease-specific therapies. For generalized LCT, multiagent chemotherapy or single-agent systemic therapy with RT for local control is used. Allogeneic HCT may be considered as consolidation.

A multidisciplinary team approach is essential for optimal diagnosis and comprehensive care. Required specialties include: hematology/oncology, dermatology (with expertise in cutaneous lymphoma), pathology (with expertise in cutaneous lymphoma diagnosis), and radiation oncology. For patients with advanced disease, consultation at centers with expertise in CTCL is preferred [MFSS/INTRO-2]. Dermatopathology/hematopathology review is recommended for confirmation of diagnosis, especially for rare variants [MFSS/INTRO-2].

Performance status (PS) is considered in treatment selection, though specific PS cutoffs are not mandated. Clinical trials for MF/SS often require ECOG PS 0-2 (ALCANZA) or 0-1 (MAVORIC). For PC-ALCL, ECOG PS 0-2 was used in the ALCANZA trial. In SPTCL, PS is not explicitly defined but influences ability to tolerate chemotherapy. Treatment decisions are individualized based on age, comorbidities, and organ function as per standard oncology practice.

Management PathwaysClick to collapse

Primary Cutaneous Follicle Center Lymphoma (PCFCL) and Primary Cutaneous Marginal Zone Lymphoma (PCMZL)

Branching: TNM classification for cutaneous lymphoma other than MF/SS (CUTB-A), Extent of disease: solitary/regional (T1-2) vs generalized skin only (T3) vs extracutaneous disease, Presence of symptoms and feasibility of RT or surgery

Solitary/regional disease (T1-2), initial therapy
Local ISRT (24 Gy preferred) (Preferred); Excision (Other recommended); Observation (Useful in certain circumstances); Topical steroids, imiquimod, nitrogen mustard, bexarotene (useful in pediatric patients) (Useful in certain circumstances)
Generalized skin-only disease (T3), initial therapy
Observation (appropriate in asymptomatic patients) (Other recommended); Topical steroids, imiquimod, nitrogen mustard, bexarotene (Other recommended); Local ISRT for palliation (Other recommended); Intralesional steroids (Other recommended); Rituximab (Other recommended); Other systemic therapy (rare circumstances) (Useful in certain circumstances)
Extracutaneous disease (PCFCL or PCMZL)
Manage as Follicular Lymphoma (for PCFCL) or Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma (for PCMZL) per NCCN B-Cell Lymphoma guidelines (Recommended)
Primary Cutaneous Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Leg Type (PC-DLBCL leg type)

Branching: Presence of aggressive histology and high risk of extracutaneous relapse, Staging with PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy required

All presentations (stage I-IV, usually localized to skin but aggressive)
Anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy (e.g., R-CHOP) plus localized RT (Preferred); Localized RT (24-30 Gy) as consolidation after chemoimmunotherapy (Other recommended)
Mycosis Fungoides Stage IA (Limited Skin Involvement, <10% BSA)

Branching: Skin involvement <10% BSA, no extracutaneous disease, Response to initial skin-directed therapy

Initial therapy
Skin-limited/local therapies: local RT (ISRT 8-12 Gy; 24-30 Gy for unilesional), phototherapy (NB-UVB), topical corticosteroids, topical imiquimod, topical mechlorethamine, topical retinoids, topical carmustine (category 2B) (Preferred); Selected cases: Systemic therapy (bexarotene, interferon alfa, methotrexate) + skin-directed therapy (Other recommended); Acitretin, ECP (for B1), interferon gamma-1b, isotretinoin (Useful in certain circumstances)
Patients with disease achieving clinical benefit should be considered for maintenance or tapering of regimens to optimize response duration. Inadequate response leads to management as Stage IB-IIA, RT if not used, or clinical trial [MFSS-6].
Inadequate response or refractory disease after multiple therapies
Manage as Stage IB-IIA MF, consider RT, or clinical trial (Recommended)
Mycosis Fungoides Stage IB (Skin-Only ≥10% BSA) – Stage IIA

Branching: Skin disease burden (lower: predominantly patch vs higher: predominantly plaque), Response to initial therapy, Presence of folliculotropic MF or LCT

Lower skin disease burden (predominantly patch disease) - initial therapy
Skin-limited/local therapies (UVB/NB-UVB, topical corticosteroids, mechlorethamine, etc.) (Preferred)
Patients with clinical benefit are considered for maintenance/tapering. Inadequate response leads to treatment as high skin disease burden.
Higher skin disease burden (predominantly plaque disease) or inadequate response to lower burden therapy
Generalized skin therapies: phototherapy (UVB/NB-UVB, PUVA, UVA1), topical corticosteroids, topical mechlorethamine, TSEBT (12-36 Gy) (Other recommended); Preferred (single agents): bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, interferon alfa, methotrexate, mogamulizumab, romidepsin, vorinostat (Preferred); Acitretin, denileukin diftitox, ECP, interferon gamma-1b, isotretinoin, alemtuzumab (cat 2B), gemcitabine (cat 2B), liposomal doxorubicin (cat 2B), pembrolizumab (cat 2B), pralatrexate (cat 2B) (Useful in certain circumstances)
Inadequate response may lead to TSEBT (if not previously used), management as Stage IIB, or clinical trial. Refractory disease to multiple therapies similarly. Response assessment includes imaging if extracutaneous disease suspected [MFSS-7].
Mycosis Fungoides Stage IIB (Tumor Stage Disease)

Branching: Limited tumor lesions (single/few T3) vs generalized tumor lesions, Response to initial therapy, Presence of LCT

Limited tumor lesions
Local RT and/or skin-directed therapy (Preferred); Preferred single agents: bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, interferon alfa, methotrexate, mogamulizumab, romidepsin. Other recommended: vorinostat, pembrolizumab (cat 2B). Useful: acitretin, denileukin diftitox, ECP, interferon gamma-1b, isotretinoin (Other recommended)
CR/PR: observe for recurrence with same stage; if relapse with > stage IIB, treat according to clinical stage. Inadequate response/refractory/persistent T1-3 with limited tumors leads to management as generalized tumor lesions (MFSS-9) [MFSS-8].
Generalized tumor lesions
Total skin electron beam therapy (12-36 Gy) (Preferred); Preferred single agents: bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, denileukin diftitox, gemcitabine, interferon alfa. Combination: retinoid + interferon alfa. Other recommended: pembrolizumab, vorinostat, liposomal doxorubicin, methotrexate, mogamulizumab, pralatrexate, romidepsin. Useful: acitretin, ECP, interferon gamma-1b, isotretinoin. Combination: ECP + interferon alfa or retinoid, ECP + interferon alfa + retinoid (Preferred/Other recommended)
Inadequate response/refractory/persistent: use Table 6 (LCT) or Table 7 (relapsed/refractory to multiple prior therapies) regimens, consider allogeneic HCT, or clinical trial [MFSS-9].
Mycosis Fungoides Stage III (Erythrodermic Disease)

Branching: Erythroderma covering ≥80% BSA, Blood involvement (B0 vs B1), Response to initial therapy

Initial therapy
Preferred single agents: bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, ECP, interferon alfa, methotrexate, mogamulizumab, romidepsin. Combination: ECP + interferon alfa or retinoid, ECP + interferon alfa + retinoid, retinoid + interferon alfa. Other recommended: vorinostat. Useful: acitretin, alemtuzumab, denileukin diftitox, gemcitabine, interferon gamma-1b, isotretinoin, liposomal doxorubicin, pembrolizumab, pralatrexate. Skin-directed: phototherapy (with caution due to increased toxicity in erythroderma), TSEBT (cat 2B) (Preferred/Other recommended)
CR/PR: maintain/taper. Relapse with same stage: retreat with primary treatment. Relapse with > stage III: treat per clinical stage. Inadequate response/refractory/persistent: use Table 6 (LCT) or Table 7 (relapsed/refractory) regimens, consider allogeneic HCT, or clinical trial [MFSS-10].
Mycosis Fungoides/Sezary Syndrome Stage IV

Branching: Presence of Sézary syndrome (B2 blood involvement) vs non-Sézary stage IVA2 or IVB (visceral disease), Disease burden (low-intermediate vs high Sézary cell count)

Sézary syndrome (stage IVA1 or IVA2) - low-intermediate burden (e.g., ASC <5 K/mm3)
Preferred single agents: bexarotene, ECP, interferon alfa, methotrexate, mogamulizumab, romidepsin, vorinostat. Combination: ECP + interferon alfa or retinoid, ECP + interferon alfa + retinoid, retinoid + interferon alfa. Other recommended: alemtuzumab, brentuximab vedotin, gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin, pembrolizumab, pralatrexate. Useful: acitretin, interferon gamma-1b, isotretinoin (Preferred/Other recommended)
CR/PR: maintain/taper. Relapse: retreat or use alternate therapy. Inadequate response/refractory: consider clinical trial, Table 7 regimens, or allogeneic HCT [MFSS-11].
Sézary syndrome - high burden (e.g., ASC >5 K/mm3)
Preferred single agents: mogamulizumab, romidepsin. Combination: ECP + interferon alfa or retinoid, ECP + interferon alfa + retinoid, retinoid + interferon alfa. Other recommended: alemtuzumab, bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, ECP, gemcitabine, interferon alfa, liposomal doxorubicin, methotrexate, pembrolizumab, pralatrexate, vorinostat. Useful: acitretin, interferon gamma-1b, isotretinoin (Preferred/Other recommended)
CR/PR: maintain/taper. Relapse: retreat or use alternate therapy. Inadequate response/refractory: consider clinical trial, Table 7 regimens, or allogeneic HCT [MFSS-11].
Non-Sézary stage IVA2 or visceral/solid organ disease (stage IVB)
Preferred: brentuximab vedotin, gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin, pralatrexate, romidepsin. Multiagent chemotherapy regimens (see NCCN T-Cell Lymphomas PTCL-B). Other recommended: mogamulizumab, pembrolizumab (Preferred/Other recommended)
Repeat imaging as clinically indicated. CR/PR: observe for relapse. Inadequate response/refractory: use Table 7 regimens, consider allogeneic HCT, or clinical trial [MFSS-11].
Mycosis Fungoides with Large Cell Transformation (LCT)

Branching: Extent of LCT: limited cutaneous lesions vs generalized cutaneous or extracutaneous lesions, CD30 expression status

Limited cutaneous lesions with LCT
Consider RT to lesions with LCT (Recommended); Concurrent management of co-existing MF based on clinical stage (Recommended)
CR/PR: observe for recurrence. If relapse with limited lesions, consider retreatment. If relapse with generalized or extracutaneous, manage as generalized LCT.
Generalized cutaneous or extracutaneous lesions with LCT
Table 6 - Suggested Regimens for MF with LCT: Preferred: brentuximab vedotin, gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin, pralatrexate, romidepsin. Multiagent chemotherapy regimens (PTCL-NOS regimens). Other recommended: mogamulizumab, pembrolizumab (Preferred/Other recommended)
Repeat imaging as clinically indicated. CR/PR: observe for recurrence. Inadequate response/refractory: use Table 7 regimens, consider allogeneic HCT, or clinical trial [MFSS-12].
Primary Cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (PC-ALCL)

Branching: Extent of disease: solitary/grouped vs multifocal lesions vs regional node involvement, CD30 positivity (>75% cells required for diagnosis)

Solitary or grouped lesions
ISRT (24 Gy curative; doses as low as 6 Gy used at some institutions; palliative: 2 Gy x 2 or 4 Gy x 1) (Preferred); Surgical excision ± ISRT (Other recommended)
Multifocal lesions (skin only)
Preferred: brentuximab vedotin. Other recommended: methotrexate (≤50 mg weekly), systemic retinoid (bexarotene), pralatrexate. Useful: observation (if asymptomatic), interferon (cat 3) (Preferred/Other recommended)
CR/PR: observe for recurrence. No response/refractory: clinical trial, retreat with same regimen (unless refractory/intolerant), or brentuximab vedotin if not used [PCTLD-4].
Regional node involvement (N1, biopsy-proven, excludes systemic ALCL)
Preferred: brentuximab vedotin ± ISRT, or ISRT alone in selected cases. Other recommended: brentuximab vedotin + CHP, methotrexate ± ISRT, pralatrexate ± ISRT, CHOP or CHOEP ± ISRT in selected cases (Preferred/Other recommended)
CR/PR: observe for recurrence. No response/refractory: alternative regimen not used for primary treatment, or systemic therapies for MF with LCT (Table 6) [PCTLD-4].
Lymphomatoid Papulosis (LyP)

Branching: Extent of lesions: limited vs extensive, Presence of symptoms, Association with other lymphomas

Limited lesions, asymptomatic
Observation (preferred) (Preferred); Topical steroids (Other recommended)
Limited lesions, symptomatic
Topical steroids (Other recommended); NB-UVB (preferred over PUVA) (Other recommended)
Extensive lesions
Observation (preferred for asymptomatic) (Preferred); Methotrexate (10-35 mg weekly), phototherapy (NB-UVB), systemic retinoids (bexarotene), topical steroids, topical mechlorethamine (Other recommended)
CR/PR: observe for recurrence. No response/refractory: use alternative regimen not used for primary treatment, or clinical trial. For refractory, brentuximab vedotin is an option based on phase II data (ORR 100%, CR 58%) [PCTLD-5, PCTLD-A].
Subcutaneous Panniculitis-Like T-Cell Lymphoma (SPTCL) with HLH, Systemic Disease, or High Tumor Burden

Branching: Presence of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), High tumor burden (widespread subcutaneous disease), Response to first-line therapy

First-line therapy
Cyclosporine (≥5 mg/kg/day, typically initiated at 3-5 mg/kg/day in divided doses), pralatrexate, romidepsin (Preferred); Etoposide-based: CHOEP, DA-EPOCH, ESHA + platinum (cisplatin or oxaliplatin), ICE. See NCCN T-Cell Lymphomas PTCL-B. (Other recommended); ISRT (up to 40 Gy) for single lesion or limited disease (Useful in certain circumstances)
CR/PR: maintenance with single agents (cyclosporine, pralatrexate, romidepsin) or observation. Relapse: retreat with same regimen or alternate not used in first-line. Inadequate response after multiple therapies: consider allogeneic HCT or clinical trial [SPTCL-2].
Subcutaneous Panniculitis-Like T-Cell Lymphoma (SPTCL) without HLH and Low Tumor Burden

Branching: Absence of HLH, Low tumor burden (localized or limited subcutaneous disease), Response to first-line therapy

First-line therapy
Cyclosporine (≥5 mg/kg/day), methotrexate (PO/SC/IM), bexarotene (PO) (Preferred); ISRT or intralesional steroids for single lesion or limited disease (Other recommended)
CR/PR: maintenance with single agents (cyclosporine, methotrexate, bexarotene) or observation. Relapse: retreatment with same regimen or alternate not used in first-line. Inadequate response: local therapy (if not used), or alternate regimens, or consider pralatrexate/romidepsin ± prednisone. Progressive disease (with HLH/systemic/high tumor burden): manage per SPTCL-2 pathway [SPTCL-3].

Pretreatment EvaluationClick to collapse

Clinical Assessment
History and complete physical examination including complete skin examination (assessment of % BSA and type of lesion: patch/plaque/tumor/erythroderma), palpation of peripheral lymph node regions, palpation for organomegaly/masses
Essential for all subtypes: PC-BCL, MF/SS, PCTLD, SPTCL, indolent LPD
Assessment of performance status and comorbidities
Essential; influences treatment choice
Assess for distress using NCCN Distress Thermometer and Problem List, including social determinants of health
Essential for all subtypes (CUTB-1, MFSS-2, PCTLD-2, PCTLD-3, SPTCL-1)
Fertility preservation counseling (sperm banking, IVF, ovarian tissue or oocyte cryopreservation) if chemotherapy or RT planned
Essential for patients of childbearing potential (CUTB-1, MFSS-2, PCTLD-2, PCTLD-3)
Imaging Studies
Chest/abdomen/pelvis CT with contrast and/or FDG-PET/CT scan
Essential for PC-BCL (may be omitted if clinically indicated for indolent). For MF/SS: integrated whole body FDG-PET/CT preferred or C/A/P CT with contrast for ≥T2b or LCT or FMF, or with palpable adenopathy or abnormal labs; consider for T2a (MFSS-2). For PC-ALCL: C/A/P CT or whole body FDG-PET/CT including arms/legs when needed (PCTLD-2). For SPTCL: whole body FDG-PET/CT to assess extracutaneous involvement (SPTCL-1). For LyP: imaging only if suspicion of associated lymphoma (PCTLD-3). For indolent LPD: imaging can be considered to exclude systemic lymphoma but not needed for typical cases.
Neck CT with contrast if whole body FDG-PET/CT not done
Useful in certain circumstances for MF/SS and PC-ALCL
Laboratory Studies
CBC with differential and absolute lymphocyte count
Essential for all subtypes
Comprehensive metabolic panel
Essential
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
Essential for all subtypes; elevated LDH is a prognostic factor in MF/SS
Flow cytometry of peripheral blood to assess and quantitate expanded T-cell population with aberrant phenotype (CD4/CD26-, CD4/CD7-, TRBC1)
Essential for MF/SS (optional for T1; recommended for T2-4 or suspected extracutaneous disease). Useful in certain circumstances for SPTCL to rule out other T-cell lymphoma subtypes.
Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangement in peripheral blood lymphocytes if blood involvement suspected
Essential for MF/SS when blood involvement suspected; also useful for PCTLD and SPTCL in selected cases
SPEP/quantitative immunoglobulins for PCMZL
Useful in certain circumstances for PC-BCL
Ferritin, HLH workup (if B symptoms or HLH suspected)
Essential for SPTCL; ferritin is a reliable marker for disease evolution
HTLV-1/2 serology
Useful in certain circumstances for MF/SS and PCTLD to exclude ATLL; results can impact therapy (MFSS-1, PCTLD-1)
HIV, hepatitis B and C testing
Essential for PC-BCL; hepatitis B testing due to risk of reactivation with immunotherapy + chemo
Pathologic Evaluation
Biopsy of suspicious skin sites (punch, incisional, or excisional; shave biopsy not preferred for PC-BCL due to deep dermal infiltrates). Multiple biopsies may be necessary to capture pathologic variability
Essential for all subtypes. For SPTCL, deep subcutaneous biopsy with adequate adipose tissue (wedge excision or deep telescope punch biopsy) is required.
Review of slides by a pathologist with expertise in cutaneous lymphoma diagnosis. Rebiopsy if findings are non-diagnostic or discordant with clinical presentation
Essential for all subtypes
Adequate immunophenotyping by IHC panel: For PC-BCL includes CD20, CD3, CD10, BCL2, BCL6, IRF4/MUM1. For MF/SS includes CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD20, CD30. For PCTLD includes CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD30, CD56, ALK. For SPTCL includes TCR beta, TCR delta, CD2, CD3, CD20, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD30, CD56.
Essential for diagnosis and subtyping
Molecular analysis for clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements
Essential for MF/SS and SPTCL; useful in certain circumstances for PC-BCL (IgH rearrangement for clonality) and PCTLD
FISH or multigene panel testing (MGPT) for specific mutations: MYD88 and CD79B for PC-BCL (to distinguish PC-DLBCL leg type from PCFCL); t(14;18) if systemic FL suspected; ALK and DUSP22 rearrangements for PCTLD; JAK2 rearrangements in CTCL; HAVCR2 germline testing for SPTCL
Useful in certain circumstances to refine diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic decisions
EBER-ISH (Epstein-Barr virus)
Useful in certain circumstances for PC-BCL, PCTLD, SPTCL to rule out EBV-associated lymphomas
Bone Marrow and Lymph Node Evaluation
Bone marrow biopsy
Essential for PC-DLBCL leg type. Often reserved for patients with unexplained cytopenias or clinical suspicion of other subtypes in PC-BCL. For MF/SS: not required but may be helpful for unexplained hematologic abnormality. For PCTLD: optional for solitary cutaneous ALCL or without extracutaneous involvement. For SPTCL: consider if unexplained cytopenias or HLH. Not done for typical LyP or indolent LPD.
Excisional or core needle biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes or suspected extracutaneous sites. FNA alone is insufficient for initial lymphoma diagnosis.
Essential for MF/SS and PC-ALCL when nodes are clinically abnormal (>1.5 cm). For SPTCL: consider biopsy of FDG-avid extracutaneous sites.

SurgeryClick to collapse

Surgery has a limited but defined role in the management of cutaneous lymphomas, primarily for diagnostic biopsy and for curative intent in selected solitary lesions. Surgical excision is not a primary modality for most cutaneous lymphomas due to their multifocal nature and radiosensitivity. However, for solitary/regional indolent B-cell lymphomas (PCFCL, PCMZL) and solitary PC-ALCL, excision may be considered as an alternative to RT, especially for small lesions where minimal non-disfiguring surgery is feasible. For LyP, surgery is not indicated due to spontaneous regression. For MF/SS, surgery is not a standard treatment except for biopsy or excision of solitary nodes for staging. For SPTCL, surgery is limited to diagnostic biopsy. For primary cutaneous indolent T-cell LPD, excision can be considered for symptomatic solitary lesions.

Surgical excision should be minimal and non-disfiguring, particularly for cosmetically sensitive areas [CUTB-2, PCTLD-4].

Excision is typically reserved for small solitary lesions where complete removal is achievable with acceptable cosmetic outcome.

Post-excision, close observation for recurrence is warranted; many lesions may recur locally, and RT can be used as salvage.

For PC-ALCL, surgical excision alone or combined with ISRT is an option for solitary/grouped lesions [PCTLD-4].

For PC-BCL, excision is an option for solitary/regional disease, but local ISRT is the preferred initial treatment due to higher response rates and lower recurrence at the initial site [CUTB-2].

In SPTCL, surgery is not therapeutic except for diagnostic biopsy due to the deep subcutaneous nature of the disease.

For MF/SS, surgery is not used as primary therapy; skin biopsies are essential for diagnosis and monitoring.

Procedures

Diagnostic skin biopsy

Essential for diagnosis of all cutaneous lymphomas.

Surgical excision of solitary lesions

Selected solitary/regional indolent B-cell lymphomas (PCFCL, PCMZL) and solitary PC-ALCL where RT is not desired or feasible.

Excisional lymph node biopsy

Essential for staging in MF/SS and PC-ALCL with regional node involvement; to confirm or rule out lymphoma involvement.

Radiation TherapyClick to collapse

Radiation therapy (RT) is a cornerstone of treatment for cutaneous lymphomas, used with curative intent for localized disease (e.g., unilesional MF, solitary PC-ALCL, indolent PC-BCL) and with palliative intent for symptom relief, disease control, and as part of combined modality therapy. RT is highly effective due to the radiosensitivity of lymphoid cells. The general intent is to treat evident skin disease with adequate margin both circumferentially and in depth. Techniques include external beam RT (EBRT) with photons, electrons, or low-energy x-rays. Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is a specialized technique for widespread skin involvement in MF [PCLYM-A].

Principles

  • ISRT is recommended as the appropriate field for treating primary cutaneous lymphomas. Planning may require careful physical exam, ultrasound, or CT-based simulation [PCLYM-A 1 of 3].
  • The visible or palpable disease defines the gross tumor volume (GTV); CTV expands 1-2 cm circumferentially and in depth, not into intact bone. PTV accounts for setup variations [PCLYM-A 1 of 3].
  • For cutaneous lesions, surface margins of 1.0-1.5 cm are generally adequate. Depth margins should include all involved tissue. Treatment with 6-9 MeV electrons (with surface bolus) or low-energy x-rays (~100 Kv) provides adequate depth [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
  • For nodal disease, ISRT principles follow NCCN T-Cell or B-Cell Lymphoma guidelines [PCLYM-A 1 of 3].
  • TSEBT techniques cover the entire cutaneous surface; patients are treated standing on a rotating platform or with multiple body positions. Shadowed areas may need supplemental electron fields. 'Shadowed' areas are supplemented individually [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
  • TSEBT is common practice to follow with systemic therapies to maintain response. Limited safety data exist for combining TSEBT with systemic retinoids, HDAC inhibitors, or mogamulizumab [MFSS-A 2 of 12].

Dose Frameworks

NameTotal DoseDose Per FractionFractionsScheduleIndication
PCFCL/PCMZL curative dose24 Gy2 Gy (conventional fractionation)12 fractionsOnce daily, 5 days/weekOptimal initial management for solitary/regional disease. Lower doses (4 Gy) may be used initially with supplemental RT (4-20 Gy) for inadequate response, though data limited [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
PCFCL/PCMZL palliative/relapsed dose4 Gy2 Gy2 fractionsTypically 2 fractionsFor relapsed disease; may be adequate for palliation [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
MF/SS individual plaque/tumor - low dose palliative8-12 Gy3-5 Gy (preferred depending on skin condition and volume; up to 8 Gy in single fraction may be used)Variable; e.g., 2-4 fractionsLow-dose RT with palliative intent, usually as combined modality therapy. Some institutions explore 4 Gy [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
MF/SS unilesional presentation - definitive dose24-30 Gy2-3 Gy12-15 fractionsConventional fractionationFor rare initial unilesional lesions, given as monotherapy with curative intent [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
TSEBT for MF/SS12-36 Gy4-6 Gy per weekVariable (e.g., 12 Gy in 2-3 weeks, 30-36 Gy over 6-9 weeks)Variety of techniques; common dose ~12 Gy. Higher doses (24-36 Gy) for more extensive or refractory disease. Lower dose has fewer short-term complications and better ability to retreat [PCLYM-A 2 of 3].
PC-ALCL curative dose24 Gy2 Gy12 fractionsConventional fractionationRT for curative treatment. Doses as low as 6 Gy used at some institutions, but data limited [PCLYM-A 3 of 3].
PC-ALCL palliative dose4-8 Gy2 Gy x 2 or 4 Gy x 12 or 1 fractionsPalliative RT [PCLYM-A 3 of 3].
SPTCL curative doseUp to 40 Gy2 Gy20 fractionsAdequate dose is uncertain; consensus organizations recommend up to 40 Gy [PCLYM-A 3 of 3].

Approaches

NameDose FractionationConcurrent ChemotherapyIndicationKey TrialToxicities
Local ISRT for cutaneous lesionsVaries by histology: PC-BCL 24 Gy (4-20 Gy supplement for lower initial doses); MF plaque/tumor 8-12 Gy (24-30 Gy for unilesional); PC-ALCL 24 Gy; SPTCL up to 40 GyNot typically concurrent; sequential or combined modality in some settings (e.g., PC-DLBCL leg type, generalized MF/SS with LCT). Limited safety data for combination with systemic retinoids, HDAC inhibitors, or mogamulizumab.Solitary or localized skin lesions across all subtypes.For MF: Thomas TO et al. (2013) reported 94% CR with single-fraction 8 Gy. For PC-ALCL: Million L et al. (2016) reported 95% cCR with RT alone. For PC-BCL: Senff NJ et al. (2007) reported 99% CR with RT.Skin erythema, desquamation, alopecia (reversible), fibrosis (with higher doses), hypopigmentation, telangiectasias. Risk of secondary skin cancers with long-term use, especially with higher doses and in combination with phototherapy.
TSEBT for MF/SS12-36 Gy over 2-9 weeks. Boosts of 4-12 Gy to individual tumors. Additional local treatment for recalcitrant sites after generalized treatment.Not standard due to limited safety data. Can be sequenced with systemic therapies.Widespread skin involvement in MF/SS (stage IB-IVA), especially for generalized plaque/tumor disease. Also used as cytoreductive therapy before allogeneic HCT in selected patients.Hoppe RT et al. (2015) pooled analysis: ORR 88% with 12 Gy. Morris S et al. (2017): ORR 87% with 12 Gy, median PFS 13 months. Higher doses (30-36 Gy) associated with better outcomes in T2 disease but more toxicity.Acute: erythema, desquamation, edema, temporary alopecia, nail loss, fatigue. Late: skin atrophy, telangiectasias, chronic xerosis, increased risk of secondary skin cancers. Lower doses minimize acute toxicity. Antibiotic therapy recommended in erythrodermic patients due to infection risk.

Systemic TherapyClick to collapse

Systemic therapy is indicated for advanced-stage MF/SS (≥ stage IIB), patients with inadequate response to skin-directed therapy, multifocal PC-ALCL, PC-ALCL with regional node involvement, extensive LyP, SPTCL with HLH or high tumor burden, and PC-DLBCL leg type. For MF/SS, the treatment philosophy emphasizes sequential use of single agents with favorable toxicity profiles before moving to more immunosuppressive or multiagent regimens. FDA-approved agents for MF/SS include bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, denileukin diftitox-cxdl, mogamulizumab, romidepsin, and vorinostat. Systemic therapy is often combined with skin-directed therapy to maximize responses in the skin compartment. Therapeutic responses vary across compartments; agents like mogamulizumab show greater efficacy in blood and skin than in lymph nodes, while HDAC inhibitors have variable responses. Therefore, treatment decisions are guided by dominant disease compartment and symptom burden [MFSS/INTRO-2]. For PC-ALCL, brentuximab vedotin is the preferred agent. For SPTCL, immunomodulatory agents (cyclosporine, methotrexate) are first-line for low burden, while etoposide-based chemotherapy is used for HLH. Multiagent chemotherapy is generally reserved for refractory disease or as a bridge to allogeneic HCT.

MF/SS Stage IA (selected cases with blood involvement or inadequate skin-directed therapy)
These agents can be tolerated long-term with manageable side effects. Bexarotene requires monitoring for hypertriglyceridemia and hypothyroidism. Peginterferon alfa-2a or ropeginterferon alfa-2b may substitute for interferon alfa [MFSS-A 3 of 12].
Preferred: Bexarotene, interferon alfa, or methotrexate (as systemic therapy + skin-directed therapy)
MF/SS Stage IB-IIA (higher skin disease burden or inadequate response to skin-directed therapy)
ALCANZA trial demonstrated superiority of brentuximab vedotin over methotrexate/bexarotene in CD30+ MF. MAVORIC trial showed mogamulizumab superior to vorinostat in previously treated MF/SS, with higher responses in blood-involved stages [MFSS-A 4 of 12].
Preferred: Bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin (if CD30+, ≥10% or any level), interferon alfa, methotrexate, mogamulizumab, romidepsin, vorinostat
MF/SS Stage IIB (generalized tumor disease)
Brentuximab vedotin effective in CD30+ MF. Denileukin diftitox-cxdl (Study 302) showed ORR 36% (by IRC) in relapsed/refractory MF. Gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin are active single-agent chemotherapies [MFSS-A 5 of 12].
Preferred: Single agents: bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, denileukin diftitox-cxdl, gemcitabine, interferon alfa. Combination: retinoid + interferon alfa
MF/SS Stage III (erythrodermic disease)
ECP is particularly useful for patients with blood involvement. Mogamulizumab shows high response in blood compartment. Patients with erythroderma are at increased risk for secondary infections; systemic antibiotics may be needed [MFSS-A 6 of 12].
Preferred: Single agents: bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, ECP, interferon alfa, methotrexate, mogamulizumab, romidepsin. Combinations: ECP + interferon alfa or retinoid, ECP + interferon alfa + retinoid, retinoid + interferon alfa
Sézary syndrome (stage IVA1 or IVA2)
Mogamulizumab demonstrated superiority over vorinostat in MAVORIC, with ORR 37% in SS. Alemtuzumab (subcutaneous low dose) has activity but requires CMV monitoring and PJP prophylaxis [MFSS-A 7 of 12].
Preferred: Low-intermediate burden: bexarotene, ECP, interferon alfa, methotrexate, mogamulizumab, romidepsin, vorinostat, or combinations. High burden: mogamulizumab, romidepsin, or combinations (ECP + interferon/retinoid)
Non-Sézary stage IVA2 or visceral/solid organ disease (stage IVB)
Single agents are preferred over combination chemotherapy due to toxicity. Multiagent chemotherapy is reserved for relapsed/refractory or extensive extracutaneous disease [MFSS-A 8 of 12].
Preferred: Brentuximab vedotin, gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin, pralatrexate, romidepsin; multiagent chemotherapy regimens (PTCL-NOS)
MF with large cell transformation (LCT)
LCT often requires more aggressive systemic therapy. CD30 expression is common; brentuximab vedotin is effective. Single agents preferred upfront [MFSS-A 8 of 12].
Preferred: Brentuximab vedotin, gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicin, pralatrexate, romidepsin; multiagent chemotherapy (PTCL-NOS regimens)
Relapsed/refractory MF/SS to multiple prior therapies
Duvelisib: initial dosing 15 mg daily with dose modification based on weight and tolerability. Lenalidomide: initial 10 mg daily, escalate to 25 mg daily as tolerated. Pembrolizumab: disease flare seen in erythrodermic MF/SS; rapid progression reported in HTLV-positive patients [MFSS-A 8-9 of 12].
Preferred: Alemtuzumab, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, duvelisib, etoposide, lenalidomide, pembrolizumab, pentostatin, temozolomide (for CNS involvement), multiagent chemotherapy (PTCL-NOS)
PC-ALCL multifocal lesions (primary treatment)
ALCANZA trial demonstrated superior ORR4 (75% vs 20%) and PFS (median 17 vs 4 months) compared to physician's choice in PC-ALCL subgroup [PCTLD-4, PCTLD-A].
Preferred: Brentuximab vedotin
PC-ALCL with regional node involvement
Brentuximab vedotin plus CHP is an option (ECHELON-2 trial). Multiagent chemotherapy (CHOP/CHOEP) may be used in selected cases [PCTLD-4].
Preferred: Brentuximab vedotin ± ISRT; ISRT alone in selected cases
SPTCL with HLH, systemic disease, or high tumor burden
Start with etoposide-based regimens to control HLH first, then move to disease-specific therapies. Cyclosporine (3-5 mg/kg/day initially, can increase) has shown high response rates. Pralatrexate and romidepsin have demonstrated activity in SPTCL [SPTCL-2].
Preferred: Cyclosporine (≥5 mg/kg/day), pralatrexate, or romidepsin ± prednisone. Also etoposide-based combination chemotherapy (CHOEP, DA-EPOCH, ESHA + platinum, ICE) for patients eligible for transplant
SPTCL without HLH and low tumor burden
Immunomodulatory agents are effective and less toxic than chemotherapy. Cyclosporine and methotrexate have shown ORR of 94% and 58% respectively in case series [SPTCL-3].
Preferred: Cyclosporine (≥5 mg/kg/day), methotrexate (PO/SC/IM), or bexarotene (PO) ± prednisone

Key Regimens

Brentuximab vedotin (MF/SS and PC-ALCL)
Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg IV Every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles
Mogamulizumab (MF/SS)
Mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg IV Weekly during first 28-day cycle, then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles
Denileukin diftitox-cxdl (MF/SS)
Denileukin diftitox-cxdl 9 mcg/kg/day IV over 60 min Days 1-5 every 21 days, up to 8 cycles
Romidepsin (MF/SS)
Romidepsin 14 mg/m2 IV over 4 hours Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle
Vorinostat (MF/SS)
Vorinostat 400 mg Oral Once daily
ECP (MF/SS)
Extracorporeal photopheresis Standard procedure Extracorporeal Two consecutive days every 2-4 weeks
Pembrolizumab (MF/SS)
Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg IV Every 3 weeks
Cyclosporine A (SPTCL)
Cyclosporine 3-5 mg/kg/day initially (oral), may increase up to ≥5 mg/kg/day Oral Daily in divided doses
Gemcitabine (MF/SS and LCT)
Gemcitabine Various schedules (e.g., 1000 mg/m2 days 1,8,15 every 28 days; low-dose schedules also used) IV Dependent on schedule
Pralatrexate (MF/SS and LCT and SPTCL)
Pralatrexate 15 mg/m2 (MF/SS) or 30 mg/m2 (PROPEL trial) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks IV Weekly for 3 weeks, then 1 week rest

Treatment Response AssessmentClick to collapse

Title

Treatment Response Assessment in Cutaneous Lymphomas

Timing

Response assessment should occur at regular intervals, tailored to the specific disease type, stage, and treatment modality. For MF/SS, assessment typically occurs every 1-3 months during active therapy and every 3-6 months during observation or maintenance. For PC-BCL, additional imaging is not routinely needed during treatment; end-of-treatment PET/CT or CT may be performed to assess response or if clinical suspicion of progression arises [CUTB-2]. For PC-ALCL, follow-up includes monitoring size and number of lesions; imaging repeated as clinically indicated. For LyP, lifelong follow-up is warranted due to high risk for second lymphoid malignancies [PCTLD-5]. For SPTCL, response assessment is guided by clinical exam, imaging (PET/CT), and laboratory markers (ferritin, LDH) especially if HLH was present.

Response Logic
  • Patients with disease achieving a clinical benefit (CR or PR) and/or those responding to primary treatment should be considered for maintenance or tapering of regimens to optimize response duration [MFSS-6, MFSS-7, MFSS-8, MFSS-10, MFSS-11].

  • For MF/SS, responses can vary across compartments (skin, blood, lymph nodes, viscera). Treatment decisions to continue, switch, or combine therapies are frequently guided by clinical assessment of the dominant disease compartment and symptom burden rather than uniform response criteria [MFSS/INTRO-2].

  • Patients with PR and suboptimal quality of life should be treated with other or additional primary treatment options to improve response before moving to refractory disease treatment [MFSS/INTRO-2].

  • Disease relapse after discontinuation of therapy may respond to re-treatment with previous therapy [MFSS/INTRO-2].

  • For PC-BCL, additional imaging during treatment is not needed. PET/CT or C/A/P CT at end of treatment may be needed to assess response or if clinical suspicion of progressive disease [CUTB-2].

  • For PC-ALCL, patients with clinical benefit should be considered for maintenance or tapering. Relapsed disease often responds well to the same treatment. PR should be treated with other primary treatment options not received before [PCTLD-4].

  • For LyP, patients with clinical benefit should continue current management. If no response/refractory, alternative regimens or clinical trial are considered [PCTLD-5].

  • For SPTCL, patients with CR/PR after first-line therapy should be considered for maintenance or tapering. Relapse can be retreated with same regimen or alternate. Inadequate response after multiple therapies may require allogeneic HCT or clinical trial [SPTCL-2, SPTCL-3].

Imaging Recommendations
  • MF/SS: Imaging (with modalities used in workup) indicated when suspicious of clinical extracutaneous disease (e.g., new significant adenopathy, abnormal labs, accelerated skin disease) [MFSS-7, MFSS-8, MFSS-10]. For stage IV disease, repeat imaging as clinically indicated based on distribution of disease [MFSS-11].

  • PC-BCL: Additional imaging during the course of treatment is not needed after negative initial staging. FDG-PET/CT or C/A/P CT with contrast at the end of treatment may be needed to assess response or if clinical suspicion of progressive disease [CUTB-2].

  • PC-ALCL: Imaging with CT or PET/CT is indicated when there is suspicion of extracutaneous disease (e.g., palpable nodes, systemic symptoms). For LyP, imaging is not done for typical cases; only if suspicion of associated lymphoma [PCTLD-2, PCTLD-3].

  • SPTCL: Whole body FDG-PET/CT is essential for initial staging and should be repeated as clinically indicated to assess response and detect extracutaneous involvement [SPTCL-1].

  • Indolent LPD: Surveillance imaging is not needed for confirmed cases. Imaging can be considered as part of diagnostic workup to exclude systemic lymphoma when clinically indicated [INCTLD-1].

Biopsy Or Salvage Logic
  • MF/SS: Rebiopsy skin if suspicious of LCT or FMF (not previously confirmed pathologically) or aggressive clinical behavior [MFSS-2]. If drug-induced skin eruption (e.g., mogamulizumab-associated rash) mimics disease progression, skin biopsy with adequate immunohistochemical stains and clonality assessment is recommended to distinguish from lymphoma progression [MFSS-A, PCLYM-C discussion].

  • PC-BCL: Rebiopsy if pathologic findings are non-diagnostic or discordant with clinical presentation. For relapsed disease, rebiopsy may confirm persistent disease.

  • PC-ALCL: Biopsy of enlarged LN or suspected extracutaneous sites is essential. Excisional or core needle biopsy preferred; FNA insufficient for initial diagnosis. Rebiopsy if consult material is non-diagnostic [PCTLD-2].

  • SPTCL: Rebiopsy if pathologic findings are non-diagnostic or discordant. Consider rebiopsy if clinical suspicion of progression or transformation.

  • Salvage therapy logic: For MF/SS, patients with refractory disease to multiple prior therapies should be considered for clinical trial, Table 7 regimens (relapsed/refractory disease), or allogeneic HCT. For PC-ALCL, refractory disease to multiple prior therapies should be managed with systemic therapies recommended for MF with LCT (Table 6). For LyP, refractory disease can be treated with brentuximab vedotin if not previously used. For SPTCL, progressive disease to multiple lines may require allogeneic HCT or clinical trial.

Molecular Pathogenesis Primary Cutaneous B Cell LymphomasClick to collapse

Gene expression profiling (GEP) studies have demonstrated that PCFCL is characterized by a germinal center B-cell (GCB) phenotype, whereas PC-DLBCL, leg type is most commonly characterized by an activated B-cell (ABC) phenotype [4,12,19]. In nodal DLBCL, GCB phenotype is associated with better prognosis than ABC phenotype. Immunohistochemical (IHC) and GEP-based algorithms used to classify nodal DLBCL into GCB or non-GCB subtypes have also shown utility in distinguishing PCFCL from PC-DLBCL, leg type [20-22]. However, these algorithms may be limited in differentiating PC-DLBCL, leg type from PCFCL with large cells (PCFCL-LC); all PCFCL-LC cases are uniformly GCB, while PC-DLBCL, leg type shows heterogeneous cell-of-origin classification [22]. A high prevalence of gain-of-function mutations in MYD88 (MYD88 L265P) and CD79B genes has been reported in PC-DLBCL, leg type and is associated with inferior clinical outcomes [4,12,20,23]. In a report of 61 patients (58 interpretable), MYD88 L265P was detected in 59% of patients with PC-DLBCL, leg type and was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival; the 3-year and 5-year disease-specific survival rates for those with the mutation were 66% and 60%, respectively, compared to 85% and 72% for wild-type [23]. GEP studies have identified that PC-DLBCL belongs to the MCD subtype (co-occurrence of MYD88 and CD79B gain-of-function mutations), which is associated with the ABC phenotype [4,12]. These findings support the use of multigene panel testing (MGPT) for MYD88 and CD79B mutations to help distinguish PC-DLBCL, leg type from PCFCL. IgM expression should be checked if MYD88 mutations are identified, as IgM positivity is likely associated with systemic involvement. The t(14;18) translocation (BCL2 rearrangement) is generally absent in PCFCL and its detection suggests systemic follicular lymphoma with secondary skin involvement [28,39]. MYC rearrangements are frequent in PC-DLBCL, leg type and absent in PCFCL [33].

Risk Factors Primary Cutaneous B Cell LymphomasClick to collapse

Anatomical site (leg)

PC-DLBCL, leg type is most commonly found on the leg, and PCFCL occurring on the leg has a higher relapse rate (63%) and lower 5-year disease-specific survival (44%) compared to PCFCL at other sites (relapse 25%, survival 99%) [48].

MYD88 L265P mutation

Present in 59% of PC-DLBCL, leg type; associated with shorter disease-specific survival and independent adverse prognostic factor for OS [23].

Inactivation of CDKN2A

Associated with inferior prognosis in PC-DLBCL, leg type [1].

Multiple skin lesions at presentation

In PC-DLBCL, leg type, multiple skin lesions are associated with worse prognosis [1].

Follicular growth pattern with CD10 and BCL2 strong expression

Suggests systemic follicular lymphoma rather than primary cutaneous disease; t(14;18) translocation detection also indicates systemic involvement [26-29].

Protective Factors Primary Cutaneous B Cell LymphomasClick to collapse

  • Solitary lesion at presentation (associated with better outcome in PCFCL and PCMZL) [5]
  • Trunk location for PCFCL (lower relapse rate compared to leg) [48]

Molecular Pathogenesis Mycosis Fungoides Sezary SyndromeClick to collapse

Genomic studies have demonstrated biologic diversity within MF and SS [4,11]. The cells of origin differ: MF arises from skin-resident effector memory T cells, while SS arises from thymic memory T cells, supporting distinct pathogenetic processes [4]. Immunophenotypically, MF and SS tumor cells are typically CD2+, CD3+, CD5+, CD4+, CD8-, CCR4+, TCR-beta+, and CD45RO+, with loss of CD7 and CD26 [27]. Variants include CD8+ MF (especially hypopigmented variant) and CD4/CD8 dual-negative variants (in LCT and hypopigmented cases) [28-30]. Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements are detected in most cases and are diagnostic aids, but they can also be present in non-malignant conditions and are not sufficient alone for diagnosis [32,33]. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) for TCR rearrangements is more sensitive and specific and can identify unique clone sequences for disease monitoring [34,35]. The loss of CCR4 expression and emergence of CCR4 genomic alterations may be associated with resistance to mogamulizumab [31]. JAK2 gene rearrangements are recognized as disease-defining genetic abnormalities in a subset of CTCL and can inform therapeutic decisions [PCLYM-B 2 of 2]. Large-cell transformation (LCT) is defined histologically as >25% large cells, and its incidence is strongly dependent on disease stage at diagnosis (1% in early-stage, 27% in stage IIB, 56%–67% in stage IV) [8-10]. LCT is an independent poor prognostic factor, with median OS of 35 months in SS patients with LCT vs. 80 months without [22]. CD30 expression is seen in 30%–50% of LCT cases and may have implications for CD30-directed therapies [8-10,222]. Other recurrent mutations include TP53, NOTCH1, and epigenetic modifiers but specific frequencies were not detailed in the source.

Risk Factors Mycosis Fungoides Sezary SyndromeClick to collapse

Age at presentation

Older age (≥60 years) is an independent poor prognostic factor for OS in advanced-stage MF/SS [16,21].

Advanced T classification (skin involvement)

T3 (tumor) and T4 (erythroderma) are associated with worse prognosis; limited patch/plaque (T1) has excellent prognosis [18,19].

Extracutaneous disease (lymph node, visceral involvement)

Presence of LN involvement (N3) or visceral involvement (M1) is associated with significantly shorter survival [16,21].

Large-cell transformation (LCT)

Independent poor prognostic factor for OS; median OS 35 months in SS with LCT vs. 80 months without [22]. Incidence higher in advanced-stage disease [8-10].

Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)

Identified as independent prognostic marker in CLIC study; used in prognostic model [21].

Peripheral blood involvement (B2)

High blood tumor burden (B2) defines SS and is associated with worse prognosis [14,21].

Folliculotropic MF (FMF)

Higher risk of disease progression; less responsive to topical therapies; advanced-stage cutaneous disease associated with worse prognosis [7-9,218-220].

HTLV-1 infection

HTLV-1 positivity can impact therapy (rapid progression with pembrolizumab); also helps exclude ATLL [MFSS-1 footnote i, MFSS-A 9 of 12 footnote e].

Protective Factors Mycosis Fungoides Sezary SyndromeClick to collapse

  • Limited skin involvement (T1, patch only) with excellent prognosis [18,19]
  • Early-stage disease (IA) with very high 5-year survival [18]
  • Absence of LCT at diagnosis [22]
  • Normal LDH levels [21]

Molecular Pathogenesis Primary Cutaneous Cd30 T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse

PCTLD are characterized by the immunophenotype CD30+ (>75% cells), CD4+, with variable loss of CD2, CD5, CD3, and CD8+ (<5%) expression; cytotoxic granule-associated proteins are positive [1,2]. ALK positivity and the t(2;5) translocation are typically absent in PC-ALCL and LyP, helping distinguish them from systemic ALCL [274,275]. GATA3 expression by IHC has been proposed to differentiate between MF-LCT and CD30+ PCTLD: MF-LCT shows strong/diffuse GATA3 expression while PCTLD shows variable/moderate expression [276]. MUM1 expression is valuable to distinguish LyP from PC-ALCL, as 87% of LyP cases are MUM1-positive compared to only 20% of PC-ALCL [277]. DUSP22-IRF4 (6p25.3) gene rearrangement has been described in patients with PC-ALCL and LyP but is not associated with prognostic significance [279-281]. In a large multicenter study, FISH for IRF4 had a specificity of 99% and positive predictive value of 90% for cutaneous ALCL [279]. Abnormal T-cell phenotype and perforin expression are significantly more frequent in PC-ALCL than in transformed MF and may be useful for differential diagnosis [278]. Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements are detected in most cases of both PC-ALCL and LyP, but may not be demonstrated in all cases and can be seen in non-malignant conditions. Demonstration of identical clones in skin, blood, and/or lymph nodes may be helpful in selected cases. The identification of clonal TCR gene rearrangement has no definitive established prognostic value but may help determine clinical staging or assess relapsed or residual disease [PCLYM-B 1 of 2].

Risk Factors Primary Cutaneous Cd30 T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse

Age ≥60 years

In PC-ALCL, age ≥60 years is predictive of lower OS rates [263].

Multiple cutaneous lesions at presentation

In PC-ALCL, presence of multiple skin lesions, extensive skin lesions on leg, early cutaneous relapse, and nodal progression are associated with poorer outcomes [264-266].

Extensive skin lesions on leg

Associated with worse outcome in PC-ALCL [264].

Older age

In LyP, older age associated with increased risk of disease progression to lymphoma [268,270].

Positive TCR gene rearrangement in LyP

In LyP, positive TCR gene rearrangement associated with progression to lymphoma [268,270].

Mixed-type LyP

Associated with increased risk of progression to lymphoma [268,270].

Lymphomatoid drug reactions

Certain drugs (amlodipine, carbamazepine, cefuroxime, valsartan) linked to CD30+ atypical large cells histologically; must be distinguished from PCTLD [PCTLD/INTRO-1].

Protective Factors Primary Cutaneous Cd30 T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse

  • Primary cutaneous disease (absence of systemic involvement) [258,259]
  • Spontaneous regression of lesions (common in LyP) [1]
  • Solitary or localized lesions in PC-ALCL (better prognosis than multifocal) [266]
  • Absence of extracutaneous spread [258,259]

Molecular Pathogenesis Subcutaneous Panniculitis Like T Cell LymphomaClick to collapse

SPTCL is characterized by mature, medium-sized, CD8+ activated T cells with alpha/beta TCR expression [1,2]. The immunophenotype is typically CD3+, CD8+, βF1+, CD2+, CD5+, CD7+, TIA1+, granzyme B+, perforin+, with high Ki-67 staining [4,13,22]. Adipocyte rimming by CD8+ T-cells is a hallmark feature. Unlike many lymphomas, SPTCL lacks common lymphoma driver mutations; instead, it is frequently associated with germline mutations in the HAVCR2 gene, which encodes TIM-3 (T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain protein 3), an immune checkpoint molecule [24,30]. HAVCR2 germline mutations (including Y82C, I97M, and T101I) are present in 25%–85% of patients with SPTCL and are more prevalent in patients of Asian ancestry [24,31-33]. These mutations lead to unchecked T-cell activation and increased risk of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) [14,15,31,34,35]. Recurrent somatic mutations in genes involved in epigenetic modification (KMT2C and KMT2D) and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (PLCG1 and ARID1B) have also been identified [22,29]. The presence of HAVCR2 mutations confers resistance to CHOP chemotherapy, necessitating treatment with immunosuppressive regimens or hematopoietic cell transplant [33]. HAVCR2 mutations can help distinguish SPTCL from benign mimics such as lupus erythematosus panniculitis [36]. EBER-ISH is typically negative in SPTCL, distinguishing it from PCGD-TCL, which is often EBV-positive [9,13,16,25-27]. Clonal TRB and TRG gene rearrangements are present [22,28].

Risk Factors Subcutaneous Panniculitis Like T Cell LymphomaClick to collapse

HAVCR2 germline mutation

Germline mutations in HAVCR2 (Y82C, I97M, T101I) found in 25-85% of SPTCL cases. More prevalent in Asian ancestry. Associated with TIM-3 dysfunction, HLH, and refractory disease [24,30-33].

Personal or family history of autoimmune disorders

Personal or family history of SLE or other autoimmune disorders commonly reported in SPTCL patients [SPTCL/INTRO-1, 4-7].

Asian ancestry

HAVCR2 mutations appear to be more prevalent in patients of Asian ancestry [24,31-33].

Young age

SPTCL tends to occur in younger individuals compared to other CTCLs [SPTCL/INTRO-1].

Female sex

Slight female predominance in SPTCL [4-7].

Protective Factors Subcutaneous Panniculitis Like T Cell LymphomaClick to collapse

  • Absence of HLH at presentation (better 5-year survival ~80% vs. ~46% with HLH) [1,4,14]
  • Low tumor burden (localized or limited subcutaneous disease) [SPTCL-3]
  • Early-stage disease with indolent course

Molecular Pathogenesis Primary Cutaneous Indolent T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse

PCSM-TLPD and PCA-TLPD are both characterized by clonal T-cell populations detected by TCR gene rearrangement studies (TRB/TRG) in most cases [5,6]. PCSM-TLPD shows a CD4+ T-follicular helper (TFH) phenotype with expression of PD-1, ICOS, and variable BCL6 and CXCL13, but is typically CD10-negative [5]. Concurrent immunoglobulin gene rearrangements may be detected in PCSM-TLPD [5]. The immunophenotype helps distinguish it from other T-cell lymphomas with TFH phenotype (e.g., angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma) and from systemic involvement by PTCL-NOS. PCA-TLPD expresses CD8 and a cytotoxic phenotype (TIA+, granzyme B+/-), with a unique dot-like expression of CD68 in tumor cells [6]. Both entities are EBV-negative by EBER-ISH. The lack of aggressive molecular features and the excellent prognosis support the reclassification as lymphoproliferative disorders rather than malignant lymphomas [1-4]. The pathogenesis is not fully understood but likely involves immune dysregulation rather than frank malignant transformation. Recurrent somatic mutations have not been systematically identified in these rare entities. Clonal TRB/TRG gene rearrangements without cytologic, histopathologic, and immunophenotypic evidence of abnormal T-cell population do not constitute a diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoma, as they can be identified in non-malignant conditions [PCLYM-B 1 of 2]. Conversely, a negative result does not exclude the diagnosis. In cases that are not behaving indolently (e.g., generalized skin lesions, rapidly growing tumors, or loss of pan T-cell markers), alternative diagnoses such as cutaneous manifestations of PTCL should be considered [INCTLD-1].

Risk Factors Primary Cutaneous Indolent T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse

No established risk factors identified

The source does not describe specific risk factors for PCSM-TLPD or PCA-TLPD beyond their association with indolent behavior and excellent prognosis.

Protective Factors Primary Cutaneous Indolent T Cell Lymphoproliferative DisordersClick to collapse

  • Solitary presentation (no generalized skin lesions)
  • Typical histologic and immunophenotypic features allowing diagnosis as LPD rather than malignant CTCL
  • Indolent behavior with 5-year OS of 100% [5,6]